Skip to main content
. 2022 Oct 14;12:17235. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-22097-0

Table 1.

Effects of ischemia/reperfusion and GA treatment on heart contractility (n = 8).

Treatment  + dP/dt − dP/dt
Ischemia Reperfusion Ischemia Reperfusion
Sham 91.76 ± 0.66 89.07 ± 1.68 91.86 ± 1.31 90.64 ± 0.67
Sham + GA 92.50 ± 0.61 91.11 ± 0.37* 93.83 ± 0.65 93.46 ± 1.82*
Ctr 66.41 ± 7.51$ 59.85 ± 7.93$ 63.10 ± 4.87$ 62.14 ± 7.91$
GA 2 h 65.01 ± 4.42$ 86.71 ± 3.65* 70.74 ± 2.75$ 89.87 ± 4.86*
GA 2 W 68.23 ± 4.20$ 85.18 ± 5.13* 64.76 ± 2.17$ 86.37 ± 5.75*
GA 4 W 64.05 ± 6.26$ 87.69 ± 3.39* 64.16 ± 4.79$ 87.84 ± 4.62*
GA reperfusion 66.86 ± 9.73$ 67.59 ± 8.37$ 72.24 ± 5.66$ 75.16 ± 5.79$

Ctr control, GA 2 h gum arabic infusion 2 h before sacrifice, + dP/dt and − dP/dt left ventricle contractility indices, GA 2 W gum arabic administration for 2 weeks, GA 4 W gum arabic administration for 4 weeks, Rep Reperfusion.

*P < 0.05 compared to control and $P < 0.05 compared to sham and sham + GA.