Skip to main content
. 2022 Sep 27;23(19):11400. doi: 10.3390/ijms231911400

Table 1.

Comparison of the Cas9 and Cas13 systems.

Cas Effectors Cas9 Cas13
Protein size ~1100 aa ~775–1250 aa
Targeted substrate dsDNA RNA
PAM/PFS The PAM region of spCas9 was NGG, while that of saCas9 was NNGRRT Different Cas13 family types have different PFS requirements, among which Cas13a tends to A, U, and C, Cas13b tends to A, U, and G, while Cas13d and Cas13X have not been found to have PFS.
Targeted site distribution Due to the limitation of the PAM region of Cas9, the distribution of editable sites is relatively general. Due to the limitation of the PAM region of Cas13a and Cas13b, the distribution of editable sites is relatively general. However, for Cas13d and Cas13X, no obvious PFS region has been found, which has an extensive selection of editing sites.
Trans-cleavage No trans-cleavage activity was found Cas13a, Cas13b, and Cas13X were found to have significant trans-cleavage activity.
Damage to organisms There’s permanent damage to the genome Because the Cas13 family effectors target editing at the RNA level, they rarely cause permanent genetic damage to cells or organisms.
Application Knockin and knockout of genes; single base mutation in DNA; epigenetic regulation Basic biochemical research; nucleic acid detection and diagnosis; nucleic acid imaging technology; antiviral applications; disease treatment strategies based on CRISPR/Cas13