Skip to main content
. 2022 Oct 2;23(19):11684. doi: 10.3390/ijms231911684

Table 3.

Prevalence of the 4 TCGA molecular prognostic groups across different histotypes of endometrial carcinoma.

Molecular Prognostic Group LG-EEC HG-EEC SC CCC Mixed UDC/
DDC
CS NEC *** MLC
POLE-mutated 6.2% 12.1% 0% * 3.8% 5.6% 12.4% 5.3% 7.1% 0%
MMR-deficient 24.7% 39.7% 0% * 9.8% 33.3% 44% 7.3% 42.9% 0%
p53-abnormal 4.7% 21.3% 100% ** 42.5% 61.1% 18.6% 73.9% 35.7% 0%
NSMP 63.5% 28% 0% * 40.9% 0% 25% 13.5% 14.3% 100%

LG-EEC: low-grade endometrioid carcinoma; HG-EEC: high-grade endometrioid carcinoma; SC: serous carcinoma; CCC: clear-cell carcinoma; Mixed: mixed carcinoma; UDC/DDC: undifferentiated/dedifferentiated carcinoma; CS: carcinosarcoma; NEC: neuroendocrine carcinoma; MLC: mesonephric-like carcinoma. * Endometrial carcinomas with a serous morphology and POLE mutation or MMR deficiency are diagnosed as serous-like high-grade endometrioid carcinoma. ** Serous carcinomas with normal p53 expression in the presence of TP53 mutation, or with no TP53 mutation but with high copy-number variation, may rarely occur. *** The only published series of endometrial neuroendocrine carcinoma assessed with the TCGA classifier was constituted of 4 pure neuroendocrine carcinomas and 10 mixed carcinomas with a neuroendocrine component [30].