Skip to main content
. 2022 Oct 16;40(1):41–66. doi: 10.1007/s12325-022-02333-9

Table 2.

Risk of bleeding with DOACs versus Warfarin in RCTs and real-world studies on NVAF stroke prevention

RCTs
Dabigatran Rivaroxaban Apixaban Edoxaban
RE-LY [6] ROCKET-AF [7] ARISTOTLE [8] ENGAGE- AF TIMI 48 [9]
110 mg 150 mg 30 mg 60 mg
Stroke or SE = ↓ = ↓ = =
MB or CRNMB ↓ ↓ = ↓ ↓ ↓
MB ↓ = = ↓ ↓ ↓
ICH ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓
MGIB = ↑ ↑ = ↓ ↑
Real-world data
Dabigatran [10, 11] Rivaroxaban [10, 11] Apixaban [10, 11] Edoxaban [12]a
Stroke or SE = = = ↓
MB ↓ = ↑ ↓ ↓
ICH ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓
GIB ↑ ↑ ↓ ↓b

CRNMB clinically relevant non-major bleeding, GIB gastrointestinal bleeding, ICH intracerebral hemorrhage, MB major bleeding, MGIB major gastrointestinal bleeding, NVAF non-valvular atrial fibrillation, SE systemic embolism

Symbols: = , similar; ↓, minor; ↑ higher [hazard ratio (HR) of events with DOACs versus warfarin]

aOnly one study available

bMGIB