Skip to main content
. 2022 Sep 28;23(19):11450. doi: 10.3390/ijms231911450

Table 4.

Response and remission rates compiled at 4–7-week follow-up (time frames vary over different studies).

Author, Year Substance Scale Response Rate
(vs. Control)
Remission Rate
(vs. Control)
Griffiths, R. 2016 [41] Psilocybin GRID-HAMD-17 92% (vs. 32%) 60% (vs. 16%)
Ross, S. 2016 [42] Psilocybin BDI ~80% (vs. ~15%) ~80% (vs. ~15%)
HADS Depression ~70% (vs. ~40%) ~70% (vs. ~40%)
Carhart-Harris, R. 2021 [43] Psilocybin QIDS-SR-16 70% (vs. 48%) [a] 57% (vs. 28%) [a]
Daly, E.J. 2018 [26] Esketamine MADRS 56% [b] 42% [b]
Fedgchin, M. 2019 [34] Esketamine MADRS 54.1% and 53.1% (vs. 38.9%) [c] 36.0% and 38.8% (vs. 30.6%) [c]
Popova, V. 2019 [35] Esketamine MADRS 69.3% (vs. 52.0%) 52.5% (vs. 31.0%)
Ochs-Ross, R. 2020 [38] Esketamine MADRS 27.0% (vs. 13.3%) 17.5% (vs. 6.7%)
Ionescu, D.F. 2021 [40] Esketamine MADRS 59% (vs. 48.0%) 43.0% (vs. 27.0%)

Clinical response was defined as ≥50% decrease in measure relative to baseline; symptom remission was defined as ≥50% decrease in measure relative to baseline and a score of ≤7 on GRID-HAMD-17, HADS D ≤ 7, BDI ≤ 12, or MADRS ≤ 10. [a] Control group was administered escitalopram instead of psilocybin. [b] After open label phase, where all participants received esketamine. [c] Results for esketamine 56, 84 mg, and placebo, respectively.