Skip to main content
. 2022 Oct 9;23(19):11986. doi: 10.3390/ijms231911986

Table 3.

Methodological Quality of Studies using the SYRCLE strategy.

Study Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 Q6 Q7 Q8 Q9 Q10 Score
Ali et al., 2019 [13] U Y Y Y N Y U U Y Y 6
Arranz et al., 2010 [14] U Y Y Y N Y U U Y Y 6
Brod et al., 2017 [15] U Y Y Y N Y U U Y Y 6
Ferré et al., 2016 [16] U Y Y Y N Y U U Y Y 6
Gurfein et al., 2017 [17] U Y Y Y N Y U U Y Y 6
Keymoradzadeh et al., 2020 [18] U Y Y Y N Y U U Y Y 6
Marashi et al., 2003 [19] U Y Y Y N Y U U Y Y 6
McQuaid et al., 2013 [20] U Y Y Y N Y U U Y Y 6
Meng et al., 2018 [21] U Y Y Y N Y U U Y Y 6
Rattazi et al., 2016 [22] U Y Y Y N Y U U Y Y 6
Takai et al., 2019 [10] U Y Y Y N Y U U Y Y 6
Wang et al., 2018 [23] U Y Y Y N Y U U Y Y 6
Williamson et al., 2012 [24] U Y Y Y N Y U U Y Y 6
Zarif et al., 2017 [25] U Y Y Y N Y U U Y Y 6
Zhang et al., 2017 [26] U Y Y Y N Y U U Y Y 6

Notes: Q1: Was the allocation sequence adequately generated and applied? Q2: Were the groups similar at baseline or were they adjusted for confounders in the analysis? Q3: Was the allocation to the different groups adequately concealed during? Q4: Were the animals randomly housed during the experiment? Q5: Were the caregivers and/or investigators blinded from knowledge of which intervention each animal received during the experiment? Q6: Were the animals selected at random for the outcome assessment? Q7: Was the outcome assessor blinded? Q8: Were incomplete outcome data adequately addressed? Q9: Are reports of the study free of selective outcome reporting? Q10: Was the study apparently free of other problems that could result in high risk of bias? Unclear; Y: Yes; N: No.