Table 3.
Study | Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | Q5 | Q6 | Q7 | Q8 | Q9 | Q10 | Score |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ali et al., 2019 [13] | U | Y | Y | Y | N | Y | U | U | Y | Y | 6 |
Arranz et al., 2010 [14] | U | Y | Y | Y | N | Y | U | U | Y | Y | 6 |
Brod et al., 2017 [15] | U | Y | Y | Y | N | Y | U | U | Y | Y | 6 |
Ferré et al., 2016 [16] | U | Y | Y | Y | N | Y | U | U | Y | Y | 6 |
Gurfein et al., 2017 [17] | U | Y | Y | Y | N | Y | U | U | Y | Y | 6 |
Keymoradzadeh et al., 2020 [18] | U | Y | Y | Y | N | Y | U | U | Y | Y | 6 |
Marashi et al., 2003 [19] | U | Y | Y | Y | N | Y | U | U | Y | Y | 6 |
McQuaid et al., 2013 [20] | U | Y | Y | Y | N | Y | U | U | Y | Y | 6 |
Meng et al., 2018 [21] | U | Y | Y | Y | N | Y | U | U | Y | Y | 6 |
Rattazi et al., 2016 [22] | U | Y | Y | Y | N | Y | U | U | Y | Y | 6 |
Takai et al., 2019 [10] | U | Y | Y | Y | N | Y | U | U | Y | Y | 6 |
Wang et al., 2018 [23] | U | Y | Y | Y | N | Y | U | U | Y | Y | 6 |
Williamson et al., 2012 [24] | U | Y | Y | Y | N | Y | U | U | Y | Y | 6 |
Zarif et al., 2017 [25] | U | Y | Y | Y | N | Y | U | U | Y | Y | 6 |
Zhang et al., 2017 [26] | U | Y | Y | Y | N | Y | U | U | Y | Y | 6 |
Notes: Q1: Was the allocation sequence adequately generated and applied? Q2: Were the groups similar at baseline or were they adjusted for confounders in the analysis? Q3: Was the allocation to the different groups adequately concealed during? Q4: Were the animals randomly housed during the experiment? Q5: Were the caregivers and/or investigators blinded from knowledge of which intervention each animal received during the experiment? Q6: Were the animals selected at random for the outcome assessment? Q7: Was the outcome assessor blinded? Q8: Were incomplete outcome data adequately addressed? Q9: Are reports of the study free of selective outcome reporting? Q10: Was the study apparently free of other problems that could result in high risk of bias? Unclear; Y: Yes; N: No.