Skip to main content
. 2022 Sep 23;11(19):5613. doi: 10.3390/jcm11195613

Table 3.

Analysis of the diagnostic efficiency of selected sphingolipids that significantly differentiated patients with and without cholelithiasis.

Marker AUC 95% C.I. AUC p Cut-Off Sensit. Spec. ACC
SPA 0.326 (0.211–0.442) 0.003 1.107 100% 26% 57.0%
C14:0-Cer 0.99 (0.971–1.0) <0.001 1.363 95.8% 97.4% 96.5%
C16:0-Cer 1 (1.0–1.0) <0.001 59.692 97.9% 100% 98.8%
C20:0-Cer 0.914 (0.857–0.972) <0.001 26.83 93.8% 73.7% 84.9%
C24:1-Cer 0.656 (0.533–0.778) 0.01 406.594 77.1% 60.5% 69.8%
C16:0-LacCer 0.721 (0.615–0.827) <0.001 1536.383 50% 92.1% 68.6%
C18:1-LacCer 0.888 (0.819–0.957) <0.001 21.977 89.6% 78.9% 84.9%
C24:1-LacCer 0.876 (0.804–0.948) <0.001 749.27 65.8% 93.8% 81.4%
C24:0-LacCer 0.93 (0.88–0.979) <0.001 250.785 73.7% 95.8% 86.0%

SPA—sfinganine; Cer—ceramide, LacCer—lactosylceramide AUC—area under the curve; C.I-confidence interval; Sensit.—sensitivity; Specific.—specificity; ACC—accuracy.