Table 1.
Related work.
| Reference | Year of Publication | Addressed Limitations | Proposed Solutions | Limitations |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| [12] | 2019 | Power supply | A dynamic complex energy network | Did not consider centralized energy storage points |
| [13] | 2018 | Inefficient energy management | A blockchain-based scheme for management of charging piles | Maintenance of the system is expensive |
| [14] | 2017 | Inefficient charging strategies and trust issues | A consortium blockchain system | Requires high mining cost |
| [15] | 2020 | Discussed different charging infrastructures and strategies in smart cities | Analysis of different charging strategies | None |
| [16] | 2019 | Insecure energy trading | Used a dynamic pricing strategy and a reverse-auction mechanism | Centralized grids |
| [17] | 2019 | Trust issues among EVs | A decentralized trust management system based on blockchain | Lacked both trust management and privacy preservation |
| [18] | 2019 | Security issues in energy trading | An incentive scheme based on blockchain | Malicious entities are not considered |
| [19] | 2019 | Secure and efficient data trading using consortium blockchain | A consensus mechanism based on pre-selected nodes | Increased energy consumption because a large number of iterations is involved during the process |
| [20] | 2017 | Inefficient charging of PHEVs and communication issue | Energy trading mechanism for (PHEVs) | Balancing of energy is not considered |
| [21] | 2018 | Introduced a new concept related to EVs in energy markets: G2V and V2G | Proves that an energy grid is an advantageous entity | Leads to environmental pollution. |
| [22,23] | 2018, 2020 | Security analysis of the Brooklyn microgrid network | An encryption scheme is used for the security of transactions | Malicious operators and selfish mining are not considered |
| [24] | 2018 | VN insecure energy management | A decentralized security model | Privacy of EVs is not considered |
| [25] | 2020 | Energy management problems | Used a deep CNN model with blockchain for energy management | Complexity is an issue |
| [26] | 2019 | High delay in service response and lack of trust | A blockchain-based intelligent, secure autonomous transportation system | Did not consider storage issues |
| [27] | 2018 | Security issues in SDN | A novel hybrid architecture network | Did not consider the efficient deployment of edge nodes |
| [28] | 2022 | Addressed the controller selection problem | Analytical Network Decision-making Process (ANDP) | Did not consider scalability issues |
| [29] | 2018 | Security threats and trust issues | An intelligent vehicular network based on blockchain | The comfort of vehicle operators in a hassle-free network is not considered |
| [30] | 2019 | Storage and security issues | A blockchain-based decentralized, distributed and secure storage management scheme | Channels are unreliable during vehicle communication |
| [31] | 2019 | Trust issues | A decentralized trust-management system based on blockchain | Message validation delay is increased |
| [32] | 2018 | Uncertainty and randomness of the charging and discharging of EVs | A decentralized power-trading model | High implementation cost |
| [22] | 2018 | Integrated blockchain with EVs for security purposes | Designed a multi-blockchain architecture | Multi-blockchains become expensive |
| [33] | 2017 | Security and privacy problems of energy trading networks | A consortium blockchain-based secure energy trading system | Requires high cost to maintain an energy blockchain with IIoT nodes |
| [34] | 2019 | Blockchain technology is integrated with edge computing in a VN | A contract theory-based incentive mechanism | The given approach requires further discussion |
| [35] | 2019 | Insecure energy trading and malicious activities | Smart-contract-based secure energy blockchain system | Privacy issue is not resolved |
| [36] | 2019 | Deficiencies in dealing with the profits made by charging stations | Proposed an optimal pricing scheme for charging EVs | Coordination issues |