Table 4.
Optimized (after fine-tuning) parameters for the three simulation cases.
| Filter | Sim. Type | L | μ | λ | Filter | Sim. Type | L | μ | λ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LMS | 1st Sim. | 2 | 4.80 | - | FTF | 1st Sim. | 2 | - | 0.99 |
| 2nd Sim. | 2 | 0.70 | 2nd Sim. | 11 | 1.00 | ||||
| 3rd Sim. | 4 | 3.70 | 3rd Sim. | 2 | 0.98 | ||||
| NLMS | 1st Sim. | 11 | 0.05 | - | LSL | 1st Sim. | 6 | - | 1.00 |
| 2nd Sim. | 2 | 0.05 | 2nd Sim. | 3 | 1.00 | ||||
| 3rd Sim. | 4 | 0.05 | 3rd Sim. | 33 | 1.00 | ||||
| FDAF | 1st Sim. | 16 | 0.10 | - | RLS | 1st Sim. | 2 | - | 1.00 |
| 2nd Sim. | 10 | 0.10 | 2nd Sim. | 2 | 1.00 | ||||
| 3rd Sim. | 13 | 0.10 | 3rd Sim. | 2 | 1.00 | ||||
| BLMS | 1st Sim. | 2 | 4.60 | - | HRLS | 1st Sim. | 2 | - | 1.00 |
| 2nd Sim. | 2 | 0.70 | 2nd Sim. | 2 | 1.00 | ||||
| 3rd Sim. | 4 | 3.50 | 3rd Sim. | 2 | 1.00 | ||||
| FXLMS | 1st Sim. | 7 | 1.70 | - | SWRLS | 1st Sim. | 2 | - | 1.00 |
| 2nd Sim. | 6 | 0.20 | 2nd Sim. | 2 | 1.00 | ||||
| 3rd Sim. | 10 | 2.50 | 3rd Sim. | 2 | 1.00 | ||||
| SELMS | 1st Sim. | 2 | 0.15 | - | HSWRLS | 1st Sim. | 2 | - | 1.00 |
| 2nd Sim. | 2 | 0.05 | 2nd Sim. | 2 | 1.00 | ||||
| 3rd Sim. | 2 | 0.20 | 3rd Sim. | 2 | 1.00 | ||||
| SDLMS | 1st Sim. | 2 | 0.10 | - | QRD-RLS | 1st Sim. | 2 | - | 1.00 |
| 2nd Sim. | 2 | 0.05 | 2nd Sim. | 2 | 1.00 | ||||
| 3rd Sim. | 4 | 0.05 | 3rd Sim. | 2 | 1.00 | ||||
| SSLMS | 1st Sim. | 2 | 0.05 | - | Wiener | 1st Sim. | 2 | - | - |
| 2nd Sim. | 2 | 0.05 | 2nd Sim. | 2 | |||||
| 3rd Sim. | 2 | 0.05 | 3rd Sim. | 2 |