. 2022 Sep 27;11(19):5722. doi: 10.3390/jcm11195722

Table 4.

Results deriving from the comparison of conventional IVF vs. ICSI for PGT-M, PGT-A and FISH analyses.

Authors, Years	Design	Analysis Years	Insemination Technique	Fertilization Rate (%)	Embryos Analyzed (%)	Euploid Embryos (%)	p
PGT-M
Feldman et al., 2017	Cohort-historical	2006–2014	c-IVF	696%	84.2%	38.9%	n.s.
Feldman et al., 2017	Cohort-historical	2006–2014	ICSI	58.8%	86.3%	36.2%	n.s.
PGT-A
Palmerola et al., 2019	Retrospective	2015–2017	c-IVF	61.8%	25.7%	27.9%	n.s.
Palmerola et al., 2019	Retrospective	2015–2017	ICSI	61.4%	74.3%	30.0%	n.s.
De Munck et al., 2020	Single-center prospective	2018–2019	c-IVF	64.0%	67.4%	49.8%	n.s.
De Munck et al., 2020	Single-center prospective	2018–2019	ICSI	65.4%	60.6%	44.1%	n.s.
Authors, years			Insemination techniques	No. of embryos analyzed		Aneuploid embryos (%)	p
FISH
Sahin et al., 2017	Retrospective	NR	c-IVF	57		65.0%	n.s.
Sahin et al., 2017	Retrospective	NR	ICSI	183		69.9%	n.s.

NR = not reported.