Table 5.
Indication | Main Findings |
---|---|
Advanced maternal age | Most available data fail to demonstrate an advantage of ICSI over c-IVF in terms of fertilization rate, embryo development rate, pregnancy and live birth rates according to the insemination technique. |
Decreased ovarian reserve | Fertilization rate, fertilization failure, implantation rate, clinical pregnancy rate and live birth rate are comparable after c-IVF and ICSI. |
Endometriosis | A higher fertilization rate is reported using ICSI, without a significant advantage in terms of implantation rate, pregnancy rate, chemical pregnancy, clinical abortion and ongoing pregnancy rate compared to c-IVF. |
Autoimmunity | Lower fertilization, clinical pregnancy and live birth rates are documented in partners of antisperm antibodies positive men treated with c-IVF. ICSI can overcome these issues. Superiority of ICSI over c-IVF in couples with thyroid autoimmunity has not been documented. |
Preimplantation genetic testing | Comparable percentages of embryos with a complete diagnosis and comparable percentages of unaffected/transferable embryos are obtained with c-IVF and ICSI in cycles with genetic testing for aneuploidy. No significant differences in contamination rates of the washing medium samples after c-IVF or ICSI are reported. |
Single oocyte retrievals | Fertilization, implantation and live birth rates per oocyte retrieval are comparable using c-IVF or ICSI. |