Skip to main content
. 2022 Oct 7;27(19):6665. doi: 10.3390/molecules27196665

Table 2.

Performance of reported different enzymatic glucose electrodes.

Electrode Sensitivity Linear Range Limit of Detection Ref.
Multiwalled carbon nanotubes, chitosan, platinum nanoparticles, glucose oxidase enzyme, methyltrimethoxysilane (MTOS) 2.8 µA mM−1 1.2 µM−6 mM 0.3 µM [17]
Silver nanoparticles, carbon nanotubes, chitosan, glucose oxidase enzyme 135.9 µA mM−1 0.5–50 µM 0.1 µM [18]
Carbon nanotubes, gold nanoparticles, chitosan, glucose oxidase enzyme n/a 6 µM–5 mM 3 µM [19]
Carbon-coated tin sulfide (C-SnS) nanoparticles, glucose oxidase enzyme 439 nA mM−1 mm−2 0.03–0.7 mM n/a [20]
Multi-walled carbon nanotubes, chitosan, glucose oxidase enzyme 4.7 ± 1.3 nA mM−1 mm−2 5–25 mM * 1.4 mM [21]
Water-based carbon ink formulations containing cobalt phthalocyanine (CoPC), glucose oxidase enzyme 6 nA mM−1 Up to 5 mM * n/a [25]
pHEMA enzyme membrane containing
glucose oxidase
3.3 nA mM−1 mm−2 Up to 10 mM * 75 µM [26]
Carbon black–Prussian blue screen-printed electrode modified with glucose oxidase and cellulose nanocrystals 57 ± 3 nA mM−1mm−2 0.1–2 mM 4 µM [27]
This work 66.8 nA mM−1 mm−2 Up to 3.8 mM * 0.3 mM

* Indicating glucose concentration in culture media.