Table 3.
Main dish choices by treatment, gender, body mass index (BMI) group, and age group. Analyses were conducted using ordinal logistic regression.
| Choice | Crude Model | Multivariable Model | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chose only FBC (%) | Chose both Main Dishes (%) | Chose only MMC (%) | p-Value | p-Value | |
| Treatment | |||||
| T1 | 17.5% (n = 7) | 35.0% (n = 14) | 47.5% (n = 19) | 0.13 | 0.23 |
| T2 | 35.7% (n = 15) | 26.2% (n = 11) | 38.1% (n = 16) | ||
| T3 | 15.4% (n = 6) | 38.5% (n = 15) | 46.2% (n = 18) | ||
| T4 | 15.4% (n = 6) | 66.7% (n = 26) | 18.0% (n = 7) | ||
| Gender | |||||
| Women | 28.9% (n = 28) | 40.2% (n = 39) | 30.9% (n = 30) | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Men | 9.5% (n = 6) | 42.9% (n = 27) | 47.6% (n = 30) | ||
| BMI Group | |||||
| 18.5–24.9 | 25.0% (n = 20) | 41.3% (n = 33) | 33.8% (n = 27) | 0.09 | 0.056 |
| 25–29.9 | 22.9% (n = 11) | 41.7% (n = 20) | 35.4% (n = 17) | ||
| >30 | 6.5% (n = 2) | 41.9% (n = 13) | 51.6% (n = 16) | ||
| Age group | |||||
| 18–29 | 24.1% (n = 14) | 34.5% (n = 20) | 41.4% (n = 24) | 0.70 | 0.63 |
| 30–44 | 27.1% (n = 13) | 39.6% (n = 19) | 33.3% (n = 16) | ||
| 45–65 | 14.3% (n = 8) | 50.0% (n = 28) | 35.7% (n = 20) | ||
BMI = body-mass index; FBC = fava bean casserole; MMC = minced meat casserole; SD = standard deviation; T = treatment.