Skip to main content
. 2022 Oct 17;128(1):623–650. doi: 10.1007/s11192-022-04528-x

Table 4.

Social Barriers and suggested enablers

Barriers f Enablers f
Difficulty of journal evaluation process 35 Thoroughly reading the scope and rules of the journal 18
Using good visuals to increase intelligibility 11
Getting information about the process from those who have submitted publications to similar journals 10
Evaluating like a reviewer before submitting to the journal 7
Examining the latest publications of the target journal 4
Contacting the journal editor 2
Failure of group members to fulfill their responsibilities in collaborative work 34 Division of labor 23
Benefiting from group members’ opinions 15
Building teams out of people who can work in harmony 13
Having a conciliatory manner when problems arise 13
Including people who can take an active role in the group 11
Setting a calendar for collaborative work 7
One person being a group leader 6
Warning a friend not completing his/her duty properly 5
Implementing a project-based study process 3
Too many educational and administrative responsibilities 32 Scheduling time for academic writing considering responsibilities 22
Dispensing with social life 14
Reducing course loads and administrative duties 4
Teamwork 2
Family responsibilities 20 Dispensing with family and social life 16
Using working hours effectively 11
Sharing tasks at home 1
Inadequate guidance of the academic supervisor 15 Supervisor’s encouragement to publish 11
Communication training given to supervisors 7
Inability to create a team 9 Building a strong academic network 8
Graduate students with incomplete academic development 9 Creating awareness of academic publication in graduate education 5
Graduate courses having academic publications as outputs 3
Compulsory and free participation in academic seminars 2
Difficulty in obtaining research permit 8 Getting help from teammates for the permits in the project 2
Too many visitors 6 Posting a warning on the door to avoid disturbance 3

f frequency