Skip to main content
. 2022 Sep 14;13(3):300–308. doi: 10.4103/jcvjs.jcvjs_58_22

Table 3.

Recovery ratios and minimal clinically important difference at 1-year follow-up

PROM PT <20° (n=64) PT ≥20° (n=124) P a PI-LL <11° (n=126) PI-LL ≥11° (n=62) P
ODI
RR 0.57 (0.39) 0.44 (0.54) 0.379 0.51 (0.45) 0.44 (0.57) 0.693
MCID (%) 85.7 83.3 1.000 81.5 88.2 0.689
PCS-12
RR 0.16 (0.15) 0.08 (0.16) 0.112 0.13 (0.16) 0.06 (0.15) 0.124
MCID (%) 46.7 40.6 0.941 48.3 33.3 0.482
MCS-12
RR 0.16 (0.13) 0.09 (0.21) 0.166 0.12 (0.18) 0.09 (0.21) 0.612
MCID (%) 40.0 31.2 0.795 37.9 27.8 0.707
VAS back
RR 0.40 (0.64) 0.54 (0.44) 0.468 0.44 (0.57) 0.60 (0.38) 0.294
MCID (%) 57.1 53.6 1.000 55.6 53.3 1.000
VAS leg
RR 0.62 (0.36) 0.51 (0.57) 0.424 0.55 (0.54) 0.54 (0.47) 0.932
MCID (%) 50.0 57.1 0.913 51.9 60.0 0.853

aIndependent-samples t-test for RR and Pearson Chi-squared test for MCID. SF - Short form, PCS-12 - Physical component of SF-12, MCS-12 - Mental component of SF-12, ODI - Oswestry Disability Index, VAS - Visual analog scale, VAS back - VAS back pain, VAS leg - VAS leg pain, RR - Recovery ratio, MCID - Minimal clinically important difference, PROM - Patient reported outcome measures, PT - Pelvic tilt, PI-LL - Pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis