TABLE 2.

Correlations between factors of SRL strategy use, comprehensive English proficiency, and English reading competence.

	GS	OT	RM	SA	PS	SO	NT	CP	SR	Total	CEP	ERC
SE	0.62	0.64	0.53	0.46	0.61	0.71	0.49	0.56	0.70	0.85	0.37	0.39
GS	–	0.63	0.54	0.49	0.59	0.59	0.57	0.46	0.67	0.78	0.29	0.34
OT		–	0.56	0.45	0.62	0.59	0.51	0.66	0.69	0.84	0.40	0.39
RM			–	0.44	0.51	0.42	0.48	0.47	0.59	0.70	0.27	0.24
SA				–	0.46	0.43	0.40	0.40	0.54	0.62	0.30	0.26
PS					–	0.68	0.41	0.58	0.64	0.80	0.49	0.47
SO						–	0.44	0.51	0.62	0.82	0.41	0.40
NT							–	0.31	0.55	0.63	0.19	0.20
CP								–	0.58	0.73	0.47	0.41
SR									–	0.86	0.36	0.35
Total										–	0.47	0.46
CEP											–	0.62
ERC												–

SE, Self-Evaluation; GS, Goal-Setting and Planning; OT, Organizing and Transforming; RM, Review and Memorization; SA, Seeking Social Assistance; PS, Persistence; SO, Seeking Opportunities; NT, Notes Taking; CP, Comprehension; SR, Self-Reflection; CEP, Comprehensive English language proficiency; ERC, English language Reading Competence. All correlations are significant at p < 0.01.