Table 5.
R 2 | F | df1 | df2 | p | B | Boot SE | t | p | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SC * LN → RA | 0.31 | 115.34 | 7 | 1,835 | <0.001 | −0.056*** | 0.02 | −3.38 | <0.001 |
SC * LN → PD | 0.36 | 149.28 | 7 | 1,835 | <0.001 | −0.08*** | 0.02 | −5.08 | <0.001 |
The conditional effect analysis of loneliness value (M ± SD) between self-control and rumination | |||||||||
B | Boot SE | Boot LLCL | Boot ULCL | ||||||
M – 1SD (−1) | −0.26 | 0.03 | −0.31 | −0.21 | |||||
M (0) | −0.31 | 0.02 | −0.35 | −0.27 | |||||
M + 1SD (1) | −0.37 | 0.03 | −0.42 | −0.31 | |||||
The conditional effect analysis of loneliness value (M ± SD) between self-control and psychological distress | |||||||||
B | Boot SE | Boot LLCL | Boot ULCL | ||||||
M – 1SD (−1) | −0.28 | 0.02 | −0.33 | −0.24 | |||||
M (0) | −0.36 | 0.02 | −0.4 | −0.33 | |||||
M + 1SD (1) | −0.45 | 0.03 | −0.5 | −0.39 |
N = 1,843. M, mean; SD, Standard deviation; PE, physical exercise; MPA, mobile phone addiction; SC, self-control; RA, Rumination; PD, psychological distress; LN, loneliness.
p < 0.001.