Table 2. Effect of different dietary copper (Cu) sources and levels on growth performance in growing pigs (n = 6/treatment).
| Cu source | Added Cu level (mg/kg) | IBW (kg) | FBW (kg) | ADG (kg) | ADFI (kg) | G:F |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CuSO4 | 0 | 30.60 | 48.70b | 0.65 | 1.94 | 0.33 |
| 50 | 30.44 | 50.24ab | 0.71 | 2.07 | 0.34 | |
| 100 | 30.72 | 49.94ab | 0.69 | 2.02 | 0.34 | |
| CuAA | 0 | 30.60 | 48.70b | 0.65 | 1.94 | 0.33 |
| 50 | 30.94 | 51.66ab | 0.74 | 2.03 | 0.37 | |
| 100 | 31.28 | 51.80ab | 0.73 | 2.00 | 0.37 | |
| CuHMB | 0 | 30.60 | 48.70b | 0.65 | 1.94 | 0.33 |
| 50 | 31.44 | 51.62ab | 0.72 | 2.02 | 0.36 | |
| 100 | 32.14 | 52.88a | 0.74 | 1.99 | 0.37 | |
| SEM | 0.84 | 1.33 | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.02 | |
| p-value for source × level | 0.147 | 0.044 | 0.150 | 0.840 | 0.166 | |
| Main effect of source | ||||||
| CuSO4 | 30.59 | 49.63 | 0.68 | 2.01 | 0.34 | |
| CuAA | 30.94 | 50.72 | 0.71 | 1.99 | 0.36 | |
| CuHMB | 31.39 | 51.07 | 0.70 | 1.98 | 0.35 | |
| SEM | 0.46 | 0.80 | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.01 | |
| p-value for source | 0.467 | 0.418 | 0.690 | 0.622 | 0.481 | |
| Main effect of level | ||||||
| 0 | 30.60 | 48.70b | 0.65b | 1.94b | 0.33 | |
| 50 | 30.94 | 51.17ab | 0.72a | 2.04a | 0.35 | |
| 100 | 31.38 | 51.54a | 0.72a | 2.00a | 0.36 | |
| SEM | 0.46 | 0.74 | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.01 | |
| p-value for level | 0.491 | 0.019 | 0.015 | 0.001 | 0.299 | |
Values with different superscripts in the same column are significantly different (p < 0.05).
IBW, initial body weight; FBW, final body weight; ADG, average daily gain; ADFI, average daily feed intake; G:F, gain to feed; CuSO4, copper sulfate; CuAA, Cu-amino acid complex; CuHMB, Cu-hydroxy-4-methylthio butanoate chelate complex.