Table 2.
Categories of Electronic Health Record VA Entries for Data Analysis
| Category | Description | Examples | Interpretation Outcome | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Usable | 1. Exact match | Conformance to the data dictionary∗ | 20/20, 20/32, 20/500, CF | Use as is |
| 2. Conditional conformance | Entry references VA lines partially read, reflecting the inclusion of letter count with or without subsequent alpha-descriptors; can be conformed to the data dictionary∗ | 20/50−2+3 → 20/50 20/100−1 moving head around → 20/100 |
For categories 2 and 3: • Extract numeric VA measures or standard observations only • Disregard counting letter or narrative information • Conform VA line measures and observations to allowed values defined by the data dictionary∗ |
|
| 3. Convertible conformance | Entry can be conformed to the data dictionary∗ after conversion, - Includes alpha-descriptors or modifiers - Recorded at test distances inconsistent with the data dictionary - Reflects typographical documentation errors, variations in language descriptors or observations |
20/20 blurry → 20/20 NI 20/50 → 20/50 5/200 letters missing → 20/800 CF@3ft → CF Tumbling E@2M → 20/400 20/12 → 20/12.5 prosthetic → NLP posthetic → NLP |
||
| 4. Plausible, not conformed | Entry did not conform to the data dictionary∗ but could be plausible | 5/400 1/125 |
May use depending on research question, the data dictionary, and internal documentation idiosyncrasies | |
| Not usable | Number strings, nonsensical fractions, and misplaced data | 20825, 2525, 60/64, 070, 20/0, 820/25, 0.35, +3.50, 1920/20 | Recorded data not plausible and deemed as missing data | |
| Single number recorded | 15, 18, 20, 35, 40, 070, 200 | |||
| Interpretation deemed arbitrary | VA recorded as 20/020, possible VA interpretations include 20/20, 20/200, 2/200 (“200-size letter E”) | |||
CF = counting fingers; NI = no improvement; NLP = no light perception; VA = visual acuity.
Data dictionary: internal standard listing of VA line measurements and observations that meet conformance and plausibility standards (Fig 1).