Table 4. Comparison of different layer schemes of LFCM.
| Index | Layer | MSMT17 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| mAP (%) | Rank-1 (%) | ||
| 1 | {000} | 64.5 | 82.4 |
| 2 | {001} | 64.5 | 82.0 |
| 3 | {100} | 64.2 | 82.2 |
| 4 | {101} | 65.0 | 82.6 |
| 5 | {010} | 66.9 | 84.5 |
| 6 | {011} | 65.4 | 83.3 |
| 7 | {110} | 66.0 | 83.3 |
| 8 | {111} | 62.8 | 81. 8 |
| Index | Layer | MSMT17 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| mAP (%) | Rank-1 (%) | ||
| 1 | {000} | 64.5 | 82.4 |
| 2 | {001} | 64.5 | 82.0 |
| 3 | {100} | 64.2 | 82.2 |
| 4 | {101} | 65.0 | 82.6 |
| 5 | {010} | 66.9 | 84.5 |
| 6 | {011} | 65.4 | 83.3 |
| 7 | {110} | 66.0 | 83.3 |
| 8 | {111} | 62.8 | 81. 8 |