Skip to main content
. 2022 Oct 17;17(10):e0276241. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0276241

Table 1. Summed FluoroSpot IFN-γ, IL2, and IFN-γ+IL2 responses to S, N and M proteins.

Group # IFN-γ IL2 IFN-γ+IL2
S N M S N M S N M
1 Uninfected & unvaccinated 12 Median Q1-Q3 48 35–121 1 0–18 22 11–41 42 25–76 10 4–29 3 0–5 0 0–5 0 0–0 0 0–0
# (%) Pos 8 (67) 1 (8) 5 (42) 1 (8) 1 (8) 0 (0) 1 (8) 0 (0) 0 (0)
2 Uninfected &vaccinated 179 Median Q1-Q3 195* 133–308 20* 8–45 25 14–53 246* 148–393 33* 17–57 3 0–10 40* 18–73 3* 0–10 0 0–0
# (%) Pos 159 (89) 49 (27) 93 (52) 166 (93) 65 (36) 1 (0.6) 49 (27) 5 (3) 0 (0)
3 Infected & vaccinated 8 Median Q1-Q3 578^ 391–808 189^ 80–230 168^ 86–250 490^ 344–550 130^ 96–252 171^ 54–268 110^ 113–155 34^ 21–69 54^ 28–74
# (%) Pos 8 (100) 7 (88) 8 (100) 8 (100) 6 (75) 7 (88) 7 (88) 4 (50) 5 (63)

The sum of magnitudes of IFN-γ, IL2 and IFN-γ+IL2 responses to S, N and M individual peptide subpools are expressed as the median, and first and third quartiles (Q1 and Q3, respectively) responses (spot forming cells/million PBMC, sfc/m), and frequencies are expressed as the number (#) and % of the participants that were positive (as defined in Methods).

Initial omnibus null hypotheses comparing the summed median magnitude (Kruskal-Wallis) to all pools of each protein were interpreted using an alpha = 0.05. When rejected, pairwise comparisons were performed and interpreted using a Bonferroni-adjusted alpha = 0.0167. *Significant differences medians in Group 2 compared to Group 1

^Significant differences in medians in Group 3 compared to Group 2. Analysis of the frequency of response (Fisher’s Exact) not done.