Abstract
Research on natural products mainly focuses on developing a suitable drug to treat human disease. There has been a sharp increase in the development of drugs from natural products. Most of the drugs that are available are from the terrestrial origin. Marine natural products are less explored. Oceans are considered as a vast ecosystem with a wide variety of living organisms and natural products that are unexplored. Large numbers of antitumor drugs are from natural sources such as plants, marine, and microorganisms. 80% new chemical entities that were launched over the past 60 decades were from a natural source. In this article, the anticancer potential from the natural source such as plants, fungi, microorganisms, marine, and endophytes has been reviewed. Emphasis is given on the compound from the marine, plant, and of bacterial origin. Finally, we consider the future and how we might achieve better sustainability to alleviate human cancer suffering while having fewer side effects, more efficacies, and causing less harm than the present treatments.
1. Introduction
During the early era, nature was the only solitary source for the therapeutic agents serving as pharmacy. Natural products (NPs) are derived from the natural source such as plants, animals, fungi, microorganisms, and marine organisms. The products from the natural source also serve as a nutrient, and with potential biological activity, these are often referred to as nutraceuticals. There are a large number of literature studies present on the nutraceuticals, but, here, we are going to emphasize on the chemotherapeutic potentials from the natural sources and some of them that are under the clinical trial for their efficiency as a potential chemotherapeutic agent [1]. The bioactive compounds extracted from natural products have significant medicinal properties [2], and since ancient times, these NPs have played an eminent role in curing human ailments. Indian medicinal system is considered as one of the oldest and organised system of medicine which is mainly influenced by Ayurveda, Siddha, Unani, and Homeopathy, and all these systems rely on natural products derived from plant terrestrial, animals, microorganisms, and marine products to treat various harmful diseases. Natural products since ancient times have played a significant role in preventing various human diseases. Traditional medicines that depend on natural products are gaining popularity in clinical medicine and pharmaceutical research and are widely accepted as conventional therapy to that of the currently available therapeutic options [3, 4]. Many studies are carried out, and these studies focus on the role played by herbs in the management, prevention, and treatment of various diseases because they are cost-effective, more efficient, and are with lesser side effects [5, 6]. Research on natural products mainly focuses on developing a suitable drug to treat human disease, and since 1981 to 2019, a total of ∼1946 small molecules with therapeutic properties have been approved and 65% of the marketed drugs were from natural sources. These natural products were either used as it is unaltered or was modified and developed based on their original structure [7]. In general, natural products have complex structures with well-defined spatial orientation, and these molecules are active pharmaceutical ingredients. In fact, half of the drugs that are discovered and developed so far are based on the structure of the natural product or are from the natural product [7, 8] of which 20 of the best-selling medicines are from or related to natural products. At present, most of the therapeutic products that are from natural source are of terrestrial origin [9].
Over the last 30 years, 61% of anticancer compounds and 49% of the anti-infective drugs that form a substantial market share are derived or developed from a natural source and have been approved. It may be noted that, in 2010, out of 20 molecules launched to treat various disease, 10 of them were directly from NP or developed from NP, and the majority of them were anticancer molecules [10]. From natural sources such as plants, microorganisms, and marine organism, a large number of antitumor drugs have been identified and derived over the past 60 years [11]. There are 236 new chemical entities (NCEs) launched as potential chemotherapeutic agents and 80% of them are from natural source or were developed depending on the structure of the compound from these sources. It may be observed that, over the past three decades from 1980s to 2012, there has been a sharp increase in the development of drugs from a natural sources, and from 2010 to 2012, the number of natural products approved increased [12]. The history of natural products being used as anticancer agents was explored with the discovery of the first anticancer agent from the plant Podophyllum pelltatum and the anticancer agent podophyllotoxin (1) that arrests cell division by inhibiting the enzyme topoisomerase II [13]. Vincristine (2) and vinblastine (3) are dimeric alkaloids isolated from the Madagaskar periwinkle plant (Catharantus roseus) and exhibit significant cytotoxic activity and are used in the antitumor therapy as antineoplastic agents. Among the entire natural products, the marine natural products (MNPs) have shown higher and most significant bioactivity than any other products [14]. In the present article, we are trying to focus on the anticancer agents that are discovered or developed from natural sources. Here, we are trying to give emphasis on the plant origin and anticancer agent from marine sources and from bacterial origin. In conclusion, we will discuss about the future prospects.
1.1. Anticancer Agent from Plant Source
The WHO estimates that, in some of the countries in Asia and Africa, more than 80% of the population depends on traditional medicine for their primary health care [15]. Traditional medicine depends on herbal products and is in great demand. Plants have played a significant role in developing traditional medicine and are gaining popularity. The international market for herbal products is estimated to grow up to 5 trillion dollars by 2050 [16]. Plants contain a large number of molecules with anticancer potentials and around 60% of the anticancer drugs are derived from plant sources either directly or indirectly [17]. Traditional medicine consists of herbal products to treat various ailments and have played a vital role in treating cancer [18]. One of the well-known anticancer agents derived from plant is paclitaxel (4, Taxol®) [19] derived from the plant Taxus brevifolia Nutt. (western yew). It is now extracted from endophytic fungus like Taxomyces andreanae and by other endophytic fungi [20, 21] making it possible for its extraction through microbial fermentation. The name of the compound, its source, and the mechanism of action (of all the compound discussed in the review) are explained briefly in Table 1. The molecular structure of Taxol consists of A, B, and C rings with two hydroxyl, two acetyl, one benzoyl group, and one oxetane ring. The anticancer activity of Taxol is due to the side chain A along with benzoyl group C2 and the oxetane; its anticancer activity is preserved by the C3 amide acyl group in the C12 chain, while the hydroxyl group at C2 increases the activity [43]. Taxol inhibits the disassembly of the microtubules by binding to the polymerized microtubule [44–46]. Microtubule is made up of α and ß tubulin subunits. Taxol also stabilizes and maintains the dynamics of the tubulin polymer. It also decreases the association of microtubule-associated proteins (MAPs) and binding of Taxol to MAP , by further stabilizing it. These changes prevent the formation and function of mitotic spindle during cell division resulting in inhibition of the cell division and in turn preventing cell proliferation [43, 44, 47, 48]. Another compound docetaxel (5) is a semisynthetic compound and exhibits antineoplastic activity.
Table 1.
Anticancer agent from natural source that has been already used in the treatment of various cancers in humans and FDA-approved agents.
| Name | Source | Name of the source | MOA | Target and type of cancer | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vincristine vinca alkaloid | Plant | Catharanthus roseus | Inhibits self assembly of microtubule and induces assembly of tubulin | Children's leukemia | [22, 23] |
| Vinblastine | Plant | Catharanthus roseus | Binds to microtubule proteins in the mitotic spindle and prevents cell division during metaphase | Hodgkin's disease (lymphoid cancer) | |
| Etoposide | Plant | Podophyllum peltatum | Inhibits enzyme topoisomerase II in DNA replication | Testicular cancer (along bleomycin and cisplatin) | [24] |
| Camptothecin quinoline alkaloid | Plant | Camptotheca acuminata | Topoisomerase I | Irinotecan and topotecan ovarian and colorectal cancer | [25] |
| Paclitaxel | Plant | Taxus brevifolia | Stabilizes microtubules and leads to mitotic arrest | Ovarian, breast, and other tumors in clinic | [26, 27] |
| Docetaxel | Plant | Antineoplastic activity: I—inhibition of microtubular depolymerization II—attenuation of the effects of Bcl-2 and Bcl-xL gene expression |
|||
| Taxane | Plant | Disruption of microtubule function | Early and metastatic breast cancer | [28] | |
| Homoharringtonine | Plant | Cephalotaxus harringtonii | Inhibition of protein synthesis in the ribosome of cancer cells | Chronic myeloid leukemia after failure of 2 or more tyrosine kinase inhibitors | [29] |
| Ingenol mebutate | Plant | Euphorbia peplus | Protein kinase C (PKC) activator | Antileukemic | [30] |
| Cytarabine | Marine | Sponge | Sugar moiety of cytarabine hinder the rotation of the molecule within the DNA. Stops replication of DNA in the S phase of cell cycle. | AME and non-Hodgkin lymphoma FDA approved |
[31, 32] |
| Ecteinascidin-743 (synthetic compound like sponge) | Marine | Ecteinascidia turbinata | Interacts with the minor groove of DNA and alkylates guanine at the N2 position | Metastatic breast cancer FDA approved 2010 |
[33, 34] |
| Dolastatin-10, (MMAE-synthetic) | Marine | Dolabella auricularia | Binds to the microtubule and prevents polymerization inhibiting the G/M phase cell cycle and apoptosis | Hodgkin's lymphoma, systemic anaplastic large cell lymphoma, cutaneous, peripheral T-cell lymphomas FDA approved |
[35] |
| Eribulin | Marine | Marine sponge | Inhibition of microtubule polymerization—by binding to high-affinity sites on β-tubulin at the exposed (plus) ends of growing microtubules | Unresectable and metastatic liposarcoma FDA approved |
[36] |
| Eribulin mesylate | Marine | Marine sponge, Halichondria okadai | Inhibition of the growth phase of the microtubule | Metastatic breast cancer approved | [36] |
| Cytosar-U | Marine | Coral reef | Interferes in DNA synthesis in cells and kills it | Leukemia and lymphoma | [37] |
| 5-Episinuleptolide acetate | Marine | Coral reef | This diterpenoid led to caspases-3, -8, and -9 activation as well as PARP cleavage. It also induced ROS generation, calcium accumulation, and disruption of mitochondrial membrane potential. | Leukemia | [38] |
| Plitidepsin | Marine tunicates | Aplidium albicans | Inhibits proliferating cell and causes programmed cell death | Multiple myeloma FDA approved 2006 |
[39] |
| 40-O-(2-hydroxyethyl-rapamycin | Microorganism | Streptomyces hygroscopicus | Protein kinase inhibitor and cytochrome P450 3A4 inhibitor; modulates human dendritic cell function | Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: FDA 2011, renal angiomyoloma with tubererous sclerosis FDA April 2012, hormone receptor-positive, HERS2-negative breast cancer FDA July 2012 | [40] |
| Carfilzomib | Microorganism |
Actinomycetes
No. Q996-17 |
Selective protease inhibitor | Relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma—FDA July 2012 | [41] |
| Doxorubicin (DOX) | Microorganism | Streptomyces peucetius var. caesius | Intercalation of DOX-base pairs on the strands of the DNA, resulting in the inhibition of synthesis of DNA and transcription, the iron free radicals generated causes cellular damage to membranes, protein, and DNA | Acute lymphoblastic leukemia, acute myeloblastic leukemia, Wilms' tumor, neuroblastoma, soft tissue and bone sarcomas, breast carcinoma, ovarian carcinoma, transitional cell bladder carcinoma, thyroid carcinoma, gastric carcinoma, Hodgkin's disease, malignant lymphoma, and bronchogenic carcinoma 1974 | [42] |
It took almost 25 years for Taxol since its discovery in 1970s to be marketed for the said purpose. In 1992, FDA approved Taxol for the treatment of the metastatic ovarian cancer. Taxol exhibited emulating results on other types of cancer such as head, neck, lung, and breast cancer [17] (Table 1). Another anticancer agent that was approved for treating cancer is camptothecin (6). It is isolated from Camptotheca acuminate bark. Camptothecin is a quinoline alkaloid that inhibits the enzyme topoisomerase and is approved for the use in various countries. The rate of response of drug depends on a large number of factors; one such factor is the type of cancer it is used in the treatment. In case of Taxol, the response rate of ovarian cancer was estimated to be approximately 30%, and in case of metastatic breast cancer, it was estimated to be 56%. This success has led to the increase in the sale of Taxol [49, 50].
Some of the plant-based anticancer agents under clinical trials are flavopiridol—a cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor [51]. It is isolated from Amoora rohituka (Andersonia) stems and leaves, is an synthetic alkaloid, and was later isolated from Dysoxylum binectaiferum (Maliaceae) (Table 2) [64]. Flavopiridol interferes with the phosphorylation of the cyclin-dependent kinases inhibiting their activation that results in blocking the progression at gap 1 (G1) or gap 2 (G2) phase of the cell cycle. In phase I, clinical trial flavopiridol (7) showed dose-dependent toxicity like secretory diarrhea [65], but response in the success rate on different types of solid and hematological malignancies has led to the initiation of phase II clinical trials. In phase II clinical trials, patients with colorectal, prostrate, renal cell, small cell lung carcinoma, and also on non-Hodgkin's lymphoma and chronic lymphocytic leukemia were tested as presented in Table 2. All the chemical compounds isolated from biological sources that are under clinical trials are presented in Table 2.
Table 2.
Anticancer agent from natural sources that are under various stages of Clinical trials.
| Name of compound | Source | Name of the source | MOA | Clinical trials against cancer | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Flavopiridol | Plant | Amoora rohituka, Dysoxylum binectaiferum | Blocking the progression at gap 1 (G1) or gap2 (G2) phase of the cell cycle | Phase I clinical trial: dose-dependent toxicity Phase II clinical trial patients: colorectal cancer, prostate cancer, renal cell carcinoma, small cell lung carcinoma, non-lymphoma, Hodgkin's, and chronic lymphocytic leukemia |
[52, 53] |
|
| |||||
| 4-Ipomeanol | Plant | Ipomoeca batatas | Inhibits DNA topoisomerase I and induces delay in the cell cycle at gap G-1 phase or S phase | Clinical trial: lung cancer-specific antineoplastic agent | [54] |
|
| |||||
| Ingenol mebutate | Plant | Euphorbia peplus | — | Under clinical trial Discontinued production due to increase risk of nonmelanoma skin cancer |
[30] |
|
| |||||
| Elliptinium acetate: a derivative of ellipticine | Plant | Bleekeria vitensis | Topoisomerase II inhibitor and intercalating agent, inhibiting DNA replication and RNA and protein synthesis | Under clinical trial | [55] |
|
| |||||
| TNP-470: an analog of fumagillin | Fungi | Aspergillus fumigates | Inhibits angiogenesis | Clinical trials for its antiangiogenic agent to treat breast, prostrate, brain cancer, and Kaposi sarcoma | |
|
| |||||
| CKD-732 (O-(4-dimethylaminoethoxycinnamoyl)fumagillol) | Fungi | Aspergillus fumigates | Inhibits angiogenesis | Phase I: in combination was checked for tolerability and safety Phase II: recommended dose determined |
[56–59] |
|
| |||||
| Irofulven synthetic analogue of illudin S | Fungi | Omphalotus illudens | Alkylating agent | Irofulvene in treating patients with stage III or stage IV pancreatic cancer. Clinical trial was conducted. Details not available. | [60, 61] |
|
| |||||
| Plinabulin | Marine fungus | Aspergillus ustus | Clinical trial: positive result | [62, 63] | |
At present, a large number of compounds derived from plants are being investigated for their potential anticancer activity; for instance, homoharrintonine, is an alkaloid extracted from the plant Cephalotaxus harringtonia (Cephalotaxacea) grown in China. It exhibited significant efficiency against various leukemia [66]. Homoharrintonine inhibits the synthesis of protein, and this results in blocking the progression of the cell cycle [67].
The other antineoplastic agents, 4–ipomeanol (8) extracted from Ipomoeca batatas (Convolvulaceae) (source sweet potato), have been evaluated [54]. This compound upon metabolic activation by cytochrome P450 (CYPs) enzyme system in the lung cells is converted to DNA binding metabolites. β-Lapachone (9) inhibits enzyme DNA topoisomerase I and induces delay in the cell cycle at Gap 1 phase or S (synthesis) phase before inducing cell death either through apoptosis or through necrosis in various types of cancers cells of human including breast, ovary, lung, and colon carcinoma cells as shown in Table 3 [78]. Other anticancer agents that are derived from plant and that are under clinical trials include ingenol mebutate, a substance isolated from Euphorbia peplus. Elliptinium (10) is derivative of ellipticine isolated from Bleekeria vitensis. Ten compounds of anthracenone C-glycosides, alvaradoin E-N, were extracted from Alvaradoa haitiensis Urb (Picramniaceae) leaves. Collected from Dominican Republic, alvaradoin-E (I) (11) was the most active and exhibited significant antileukemic activity at a dose of 0.2 mg/kg per i.p. injection in vivo P388 assay [70]. In in vivo hollow fiber experiment, alvaradoin E showed significant inhibition in growth at the i.p. site with KB, LNcaP, and CoI2 cells (Table 3) [69, 79]. Pancratistatin (12) is a natural compound initially extracted from spider lily, a Hawaiian native plant of the family Amaryllidaceae, used as anticancer agent (Figure 1).
Table 3.
Anticancer agent that shows chemotherapeutic properties on various cell lines.
| Name of the compound | Source | Name of the source | Mechanism of action | Activity against cell line | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4-Ipomeanol | Plant | Ipomoeca batatas | Inhibits DNA topoisomerase I and induces delay in the cell cycle at gap G-1 phase or S phase | Induces cell death in human carcinoma including breast, ovary, lung, and colon carcinoma cells | [54, 68] |
|
| |||||
| Alvaradoin E (10) | Plant | Alvaradoa haitiensis Urb | — | Antileukemic activity KB, LNcaP, and CoI2 cells |
[69, 70] |
|
| |||||
| Laulimalide and Isolanulide | Marine | Hyatella sp | Microtubule—stabilizing agent—inhibited the P-glycoprotein responsible for multiple drug resistance in tumor cells | Cytotoxic against KB cell line | [71] |
|
| |||||
| 5-Episinuleptolide acetate | Marine | Sinularia sp | — | Cytotoxic against cell lines like K562, Molt 4, and HL 60. | [38] |
|
| |||||
| Secosterol | Marine | Lobophytum sp | — | Antitumor and antileukemic against human ovarian tumor and human leukemia cell lines | [72, 73] |
|
| |||||
| Fucoidan-sulfated polysaccharide | Marine | Brown algae | Activation of the host immune responses | Effective against apoptosis, human lymphoma, and HS-Sultan cell line | [74] |
|
| |||||
| Halomon pentahalogenated | Marine | Portieria hornemannii | Acts as demethylating agent | Cytotoxic cancer cell line | [75, 76] |
|
| |||||
| Polyunsaturated aldehydes (PUAs) | Marine diatoms | Thalassiosira rotula, S. costatum, and P. delicatissima | — | Anticancer against human colon adenocarcinoma cell line | [77] |
Figure 1.

Chemotherapeutic agents obtained from plant resources.
1.2. Anticancer Agent from Marine Natural Products
As mentioned earlier, half of the drugs that are developed or discovered are designed based on the chemical structures from the natural products (NPs) [7]. Most of the therapeutics that are derived are of terrestrial origin. Recently, the focus has been shifted from terrestrial to marine-based products or marine natural products (MNPs) due to novelty in its chemical structure and biological activity [80]. Earth surface is covered by 70% of ocean, which hosts 32 of the 34 phyla discovered on Earth. There is a wide range of diversity among species per square meter in the marine ecosystems. It also has vast diversity among species in each area, and coral reefs show the greatest diversity among all the species. It is not surprising that the ocean is considered as a large unexplored reservoir of diverse and unique NPs [81].
The products obtained from marine environment show significant and higher bioactivity than any other natural products like the one obtained from terrestrial sources. Around 228,500 biologically active compounds have been identified till 2016 [82] from marine source out of which 300 of them have been patented [83]. 37 patents registered in US and Europe are deep sea products. Majority of the novel compounds extracted are from soft-bodied invertebrates residing in the coral reefs. The new generation of pharmaceuticals derived from marine sponge are ready to enter the market [84]. Before 2013, FDA or EMEA approved eight drugs, of which 4 were anticancer drugs. Marine product gained its popularity with the discovery of the cytostatic agent a nucleoside spongouridine (13a) and spongothymidine (13b) isolated from Caribbean sponge Tethya crypta. Based on this, a synthetic refered cytosine arabinoside cytarabine (14) was synthesized as an effective antileukemic agent and later FDA approved in the treatment of AME and non-Hodgkin lymphoma (Table 1) [85].
Trabectedin (15) was approved by the European union in 2007 to treat reverted incidents of platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer and soft tissue sarcoma and is the first anticancer agent from marine source approved by EU [86]. Trabectedin is derived from ascidian Ecteinascidia turbinate inhabiting Mediterranean and Caribbean Sea. Food and Drug Administration approved it in 2015. The mechanism of action of trabectedin is that it binds to the DNA and prevents the transcription of RNA and inhibits the binding of DNA transcription factor as shown in Table 1. It also controls the microenvironment in and around the tumor by regulating the angiogenic factors and cytokinesis [87, 88].
Synthetic analogue synthesized from the natural marine compound halichondrin (16) from sponges such as Halichondria okadai and Lyssodendoryx spp. is Eribulin mesylate (17) which was approved by FDA in 2010 and by EU in 2011 to treat patients with metastatic breast cancer (Table 1) [89]. Mechanism of action of this synthetic analogue is that it interferes with the dynamic of the microtubule preventing its progression phase and depolymerizing the microtubule and resulting in arrest of the interphase of cell cycle and apoptosis [90].
Another drug that got approval in 2011 by Food and Drug Administration is brentuximab vedotin (18). The cytotoxic effect of this drug is due to its combined effect of cytotoxic agent along with tumor-targeted specific monoclonal antibody. It got the approval to treat patients with systemic anaplastic large cell lymphoma and Hodgkin lymphoma. Its cytotoxic effect is due to monomethyl auristatin E (MMAE) and antibody that targets CD30 receptor on the cell membrane found in tumor cell and rarely in normal cells. These two components are linked together by bond [91, 92]. Auristatin is a synthetic version of dolastatin (19), previously obtained from the mollusk Dolabella auricularia inhabiting the Indian ocean, and now, it is being extracted from the cyanobacteria Symploca mechanism of action (presented in Table 1) which is due to toxic nature; it is not advisable to administer it alone but combination with conjugate antibody specific tumors may be targeted [93]. Brentuximab vedotin interacts with the CD30 receptor on the tumor cell and gets its entry into the cell via clathrin-assisted endocytosis. As it comes in contact with the lysosome, the hydrolytic enzymes in the lysosomes cleaves the bond releasing the MMAE into the cytosol. MMAE prevents the polymerization of the tubulin by binding to it and prevents the progression in to Gap2/M phase of the cell cycle resulting in programmed cell-death [94].
Plitidepsin is a cyclic depsipeptide found in the marine tunicates Aplidium albicans in the Mediterranean Sea. Due to its low toxicity and high antitumor activity, FDA in 2006 approved it for the treatment of multiple myeloma (Table 1) [95]. Plitidepsin exerts its anticancer activity by inhibiting the proliferating cell and causes programmed cell death in multiple myeloma (MM), plasmacytoma, prostate cancer pancreatic cancer, and ovarian cancer [39].
Some of the chemicals extracted from the marine natural product with potential chemotherapeutic properties are under clinical trials for their activity shown in Table 2.
Soblidotin is under phase II of the clinical trial. It is extracted from the sea hare Dolabella auricularia. It is the synthetic derivative of dolastatin. MOA of soblidotin is that it is a vascular disrupting agent that causes disruption of vascular in the tumor cell. It also has tubulin inhibitory and cytotoxic properties [96].
Elisidepsin is extracted from marine sea slugs Elysia rufescens, a marine mollusk. It belongs to the family of Kahalalide compounds and is a mock cyclic depsipeptide [97]. It has shown some promising cytotoxic properties in in vitro studies and caused oncolytic cell death rather than apoptosis. It is now under clinical trial for its anticancer properties and for its encouraging therapeutic index [86]. The mechanism by which it exerts its effect is not understood fully, but it has been reported to cause cell death through autophagy via inhibition of Akt/mTOR and stimulation of DAPK (death-associated protein kinase) and independent of caspase-free [98].
Bryostatin 1 is derived from marine bryozoan Bugula neritina (Bugulidae). It exhibits both antineoplastic and immuno-potentiation properties.
Other MNPs like coral possess various medicinal properties and are known to have various anticarcinogenic activity [99]. Cytosar-U was the first marine anticancer drug from the coral reefs and is used in treating leukemia and lymphoma. It interferes in the synthesis of DNA in the cells and kills it [100]. There are several literature studies available on the anticancer activity exhibited by corals, and several molecules have also been extracted from various corals [101]. One of the compounds that exhibited anticancer activity by activation of various proapoptotic factors was from the Sinularia species [102]. 5-Episinuleptolide acetate (20) (categorized as noncembranoidal diterpene) exhibited significant antiproliferative activity against various cell lines such as K562, Molt 4, and HL 60. In HL60 cancer cell line, there was activation of the downstream apoptotic pathways through Hsp90 inhibition [38]. Sterols present in Subergorgia reticulate, a soft coral, induced an apoptotic cycle in the cell that results in the anticancer activity [103]. Secosterol with gorgosterol side chain and with unusual oxygenation pattern on A and B rings was discovered or isolated from soft coral Lobophytum spp. [73], and they reported that the discovered compound exhibited antitumor and antileukemic properties against human ovarian tumor and human leukemia cell line. González and his coworkers isolated 13 novel steroids from Isis hippuris which is recognized as a species rich source of cytotoxic polyoxygenated steroids [104]. Chemotherapy comes with lots of different side effects, whereas there are no available reports associated with coral reef and side effect [105]. It may be considered as one of the best chemotherapeutic agents with no adverse effects.
Marine blue green algae, also called as Cyanobacteria, are the other areas or fields from which marine drugs can be isolated or extracted. The cell extract of Calothrix isolates showed positive results when it was tested against HeLa cancer cell lines. Borophycin (21) is a metabolite containing boron, isolated from Nostoc linckia, and N. spongiaeforme was used against human epidermoid carcinoma and colorectal adenocarcinoma cell line successfully [106, 107]. Later in 1998, Banker and Carmeli described that borophycin can be derived both from terrestrial (Streptomyces antibioticus) and marine strains (S. griseus) as well. Bryostatins was isolated from the marine organism Bugula neritina and was submitted by Jack Rudloe to anticancer drug discovery group at National Cancer institute (NCI). Bryostatins (22) are macrolide lactones and are significant inhibitors of protein kinase C [108].
Marine herb is another marine product with some encouraging prospects as an anticancer agent, apart from being rich in vitamins, minerals, proteins, and polysaccharides. It contains a considerable amounts of (2R,3R)-30,40,5,50,7-pentahydroxyflavan-3-yl gallate and 3,4,5-trihydroxybenzoic acid [11]. Different derivatives of marine herbs have been studied extensively for its anticancer activity. Vasanthi and her coworkers carried out a study of the ethanolic extract of Acanthophora spicifera against Ehrlich's ascites carcinoma cells in mice and reported from their work that the size of the tumor started to decrease and even the cell count. Other marine herbs that possess cytotoxic activity are Ulva reticulata and Gracileria foliifera [109]. Fucoidan (23), sulfated polysaccharide, was isolated from brown algae. Fucoidan was found to be effective against apoptosis in the human lymphoma HS-Sultan cell line [110, 111]. National Cancer Institute, USA, carried out screening for the cytotoxic activity of the marine herb Portieria hornemannii and isolated halomon (24)—a pentahalogenated monoterpene—and found out that this biosynthetic product was cytotoxic against cancer cell line [112]. Sargassum polycystum is found in South China Sea and is a source of sterols called stigmasterol and S. carpophyllum from North China Sea from which different sterols can be extracted which showed significant results when tested on cancer cell lines. These two species are noted for their anticancer activity against various cancer cell line culture [113]. The marine herbs contain high quantity of polyphenols; alkaloids, and polysaccharides; hence, marine herbs are the source of research for many investigators to investigate new entities for pharmaceutical products. Compounds like polyphenols are xenobiotic metabolizing enzymes that can restrict the growth and development of cancer cells, whereas flavonoids can be a potential agent targeted to kill cancer cells or prevent aromatase to prevent the growth of cancer cells [114].
Sea weeds are being a source of a wide variety of chemicals. Several biomolecules with a variety of therapeutic potentials have been isolated such as sulfated polysaccharides, polyphenolic, terpenoids, flavonoids, and lipid-natured secondary metabolites. These secondary metabolites are known to have biological activity. Among them, one of the activities is antimutagenic activity [115]. Brown, red, and green sea weeds have showed significant antiproliferative activity against various malignancy cell-line [116, 117].
Marine microorganism has been the source of anti-infective agents since several years. Alkaloids and quinine isolated from marine microorganisms like bacteria may possess anticancer activity. Adriamycin, daunorubicin, mitomycin C, streptonigrin, and lapachol are analogues of quinine and have shown significant anticancer activity [118].
Diatoms are a marine unicellular organism that produces polyunsaturated aldehydes (PUAs). From marine diatoms, three PUAs have been isolated such as Thalassiosira rotula, S. costatum, and P. delicatissima, and these three PUAs (2-trans-4-cis-7-cis-decatrienal, 2-trans-4-trans-7-cis-decatrienal, and 2-trans-4-trans-decadienal) are potential anticancer agents against human colon adenocarcinoma cell line (Table 3) [77] (Figure 2).
Figure 2.

Chemotherapeutic agents obtained from marine resources.
1.3. Anticancer Agent from Microorganisms
Microorganisms are a source to various structurally different bioactive compounds and have contributed towards large number of antibacterial agents and towards large number of pharmaceutical products and also as nutrients in various food products. Jameel and his colleagues in their review article have reported the beneficial effects of nutraceuticals from bacterial origin that possess various biological activities and anticancer properties [119]. Microorganisms that leave in extreme conditions are a source of chemicals that have significant medical benefits. Microorganisms are the source of secondary metabolites. In recent years, secondary metabolites with antitumor properties from microorganisms have been discovered. There are many bacterial proteins and peptides that possess antiproliferative activity and are currently being used to treat human cancer, and some of them are under clinical trials or explored in in vitro studies for their antiproliferative properties. Some of the proteins or peptides that are being used and that exhibit the property are being reported here in this section. The most recently approved anticancer drug derived from the microorganism Streptomyces hygroscopicus is everolimus (25), which is 40-O-(2-hydroxyethyl) derivative of macrolide sirolimus [120]. FDA approved Everolimus in 2011 to treat pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor. It is derived from microorganism Streptomyces hygroscopicus. It is an inhibitor of the mammalian target rapamycin (mTOR) (Table 1). Novartis is marketing it under the trade name Afinitor. The FDA in April 2012 approved it for the treatment of renal angiomyolipoma with tuberous sclerosis complex and got approval to treat hormone receptor-positive, HERS2-negative breast cancer in July 2012. The US FDA on 20 July 2012 approved carfilzomib (26) (Table 1), for the treatment of relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma in patients who received prior two therapies including bortezomib and immunomodulatory agents. Carfilzomib is a selective protease inhibitor. It is a tetrapeptide-epoxyketone, an analog of epoxomicin (27) and isolated from Actinomycetes (no. Q996-17) [121]. It is an antitumor agent. Onyx Pharmaceuticals is marketing this product.
Doxorubicin (DOX)—derived from Streptomyces peucetius var. caesius—is an antibiotic with antitumor properties. It is an anthracycline compound and is amphiphilic in nature which is due to the aglycone hydrophobic and hydrophilic functional group of amino sugar [122]. The mechanism by which DOX exerts its antitumor activity is by 2 steps. It acts on the nucleic acid of the proliferative cells. First, intercalation of DOX with base pairs on the strands of the DNA results in the inhibition of synthesis of DNA and transcription [123]. Secondly, the iron-free radicals generated cause cellular damage to membranes, protein, and DNA (Table 1) [42]. Doxorubicin is the most common drug used in the chemotherapy. It was approved by the FDA for the treatment of acute lymphoblastic leukemia, acute myeloblastic leukemia, Wilms' tumor, neuroblastoma, soft tissue and bone sarcomas, breast carcinoma, ovarian carcinoma, transitional cell bladder carcinoma, thyroid carcinoma, gastric carcinoma, Hodgkin's disease, malignant lymphoma, and bronchogenic carcinoma. Preet et al. [124] reported that the treatment efficiency increases if doxorubicin was administered along with nisin [124].
Actinomycin D (dactinomycin) is one of the most common antibiotics that are derived from Actinomyces antibioticus. With molecular formula C62H86N12O16 and mol. wt. of 1.26 kDa, it is effective in the treatment of Wilms cancer, Ewing sarcoma, neuroblastomas, and trophoblastic tumors, primarily in children [125]. It exhibits both antibiotic and antitumor properties. There are various mechanisms through which actinomycin D exerts its cytotoxic and antitumor properties, intercalation to DNA and stabilizes the enzymes topoisomerase I And II [126]. It blocks the expression of DNA and RNA in turn resulting in preventing protein synthesis and inducing programmed cell death (apoptosis) [127].
Bleomycin (BLM) is combination of glycopeptides with antibiotics and cytotoxic properties. BLM is isolated from bacteria Streptomyces verticillus. MOA of BLM is it causes the cleavage of DNA as the result of binding of BLM to the DNA and Fe(II). It is used in the treatment of head and neck squamous cell carcinomas, Hodgkin's disease, non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, testicular carcinomas, ovarian cancer, and malignant pleural effusion [128].
Mitomycin C has antitumor properties; it is isolated form actinomyces Streptomyces caespitosus. Mechanism of action is it inhibits DNA replication by binding to the DNA during alkylation crosslinking the double strands and preventing the replication of DNA [129]. It is used in the treatment of various cancers such as head and neck, lungs, breast, cervix, bladder, colorectal and anal, hepatic cell carcinoma, and melanoma in addition to stomach and pancreatic cancer.
Other proteins that are extracted from bacteria with activity include bovicin HC5 isolated from Streptococcus bovis. It shows structural and functional similarities with other chemical nisin secreted by bacteria [130]. Later, Paiva and his coworkers reported the cytotoxic property of bovicin in their in vitro studies carried out against human breast adenocarcinoma (MCF-7) and human liver hepatocellular carcinoma (HepG2) [131].
Laterosporulin 10 (LS10) is defensin-like protein found in Brevibacillus sp. With antimicrobial properties, the cytotoxic properties of LS10 were investigated by using normal prostate epithelium cell line (RWPE-1) and five other different human cancer cell lines such as cervical cancer (HeLa), embryonic kidney cancer (HEK293T), fibrosarcoma (HT1080), lung carcinoma (H1299), and breast cancer (MCF-7). It was reported by the investigators that, on all the cell lines, LS10 exhibited dose-dependent cytotoxic property with a maximum concentration of 10 μM on the breast cancer cell line. LS10 was not toxic to normal cells at concentration up to 15 μM. It may be noted that it caused programmed cell death in cancerous cells at lower concentration and necrosis at higher concentration in the cancer cells [132].
Nisin is an antibacterial peptide found in Lactococcus lactis. It is a broad-spectrum antibacterial agent which is effective against Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria. Joo and his research team studied the anticancer activity and reported that Nisin-A showed antitumor activity against head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) [133].
Lots of effort have been placed over the past few years to explore the anticancer potential of the diverse chemical constituents present in the microorganism as a result of which large number of proteins and enzymes isolated from bacteria with anticancer activity are being studied in vitro and can be further explored for their potential in clinical studies in this regard. As clear from the literature, substantial numbers of anticancer agents are from natural sources such as plants, MNPs, and bacteria. Fungi are less explored in this area. Fungi produces large number of secondary metabolites with therapeutical properties. These metabolites have shown tremendous potentials as an antimicrobial agent, with antioxidant activity, and showed encouraging properties as anticancer agents in vitro. Jameel and his colleagues reported in their review the biological activity of fungi and its metabolites on the above-said properties [134].
However, it may be noted that, over the past few decades, the fungal metabolites are explored for this purpose, as a result of which there are many fungal-derived metabolite anticancer agents in clinical studies. Fungi produce many novel chemicals or metabolites that possess various biological activities, and a large number of these have been shown to possess cytotoxic activity. Misiek and Hoffmeister in their review article presented the pharmaceutical potentials of chemical constituents of fungal origin with various biological activities such as antiviral and antitumour [135]. Reports have shown that more than 1500 metabolites derived from fungi possess antitumor and antibiotic activity, of which some have entered clinical trial studies and the others serve as the main structures in the synthesis of clinically approved anticancer or antitumor drugs [136]. Among the fungi species, Aspergillus and Penicillium species contribute the most, around 30% of the isolated metabolite [137].
Fumagillin (28) is a fungal metabolite that has been extensively valuated for anticancer activity. It arises from the biosynthesis of sesquiterpenoid (C15-nucleus) and polyketides (C10 side chain) from the fungus Aspergillus fumigates [138]. Based on this, enormous number of semisynthetic analogues of fumagillin are being synthesized to increase its anticancer potential and at the same time to minimize its toxicity. Of these synthesized products, TNP-470 (29) and CKD-732 (30) were considered as the most potent one. In vitro and in vivo studies have shown that TNP-470 inhibits angiogenesis. TNP-470 in 1992 entered clinical trials (Table 2) as an antiangiogenic agent to treat breast, prostrate, brain cancer, and Kaposi sarcoma [139–141]. When compared to TNP-470, CKD-732 (6-O-(4-dimethylaminoethoxy) cinnamoyl fumagillol hemioxalate) was found to be more potent and less toxic, and it entered the clinical trials for its evaluation (Table 2) [56, 59]. In phase I trial, the combination of capecitabine and oxaliplatin with CKD-732 was evaluated for its tolerability, safety, and pharmacokinetics in nine patients suffering from metastatic colorectal cancer and who were progressed to irinotecan chemotherapy. In phase II trial, CKD-732-recommended doses were determined to be 5 mg/m2/d, and this recommended dose was combined with other drugs capecitabine and oxaliplatin. Further studies are required on a larger group of population with CKD-732 along with other conventional chemotherapeutic drugs [58].
Irofulven (31) is a synthetic analogue of sesquiterpene illudin (32). It has a significantly low therapeutic index and is more selective towards human tumor cells [142]. It is a DNA alkylating agent (Table 2). The US FDA in 2001 gave approval for clinical trials. MGI Pharma and National Cancer Institute conducted the clinical trials. Irofulven showed encouraging results in the trials. The malignant tumors shrinked, and even the tumors that were resistant to the drugs also decreased in size. [61]. It showed promising outcomes in pancreatic cancer patients who had ceased responding to treatment. A phase III clinical investigation was initiated as a result of these positive outcomes [60]. Plinabulin (33) is an orally active diketopiperazine derivative with potential antineoplastic activity. Plinabulin selectively targets and binds to the colchicine-binding site of tubulin, thereby interrupting equilibrium of microtubule dynamics (Figure 3).
Figure 3.

Chemotherapeutic agents obtained from microorganisms.
1.4. Anticancer Agents from Endophytes
Endophytes are the organisms such as bacteria, yeast, and fungi that live in the plant or that spend some part of their life cycle inside the plant without causing any pathogenic effect [143]. There has been an increase in the evidence that suggest that the association between plants and microorganism such as endophytes, fungi and rhizosphere bacteria contain large number of untapped chemicals that need to be explored for their pharmaceutical potentials. These NPs from microorganism contain diverse bioactive chemicals. The chemical structure and the biological activity of the compound isolated from the plant associated with microbial strain has been reported in the review article [144].
There are around one million fungal endophytes [63]. Taxol was discovered in 1993 to be produced by the fungus that lives in the yew tree. It has now been isolated from a large variety of endophytic fungi, allowing it to be manufactured by growing these kinds of fungi, which will lower the time and cost of manufacturing [145, 146]. Paclitaxel, on the other hand, is the first cytotoxic secondary metabolite of fungal origin to be used in clinical practice which is discussed above.
It was first reported that the endophytic fungi Entrophospora infrequens from Nothapodytes foetida have the ability to produce camptothecin (CPT) methoxy-camptothecin (34) and 10-hydroxycamptothecin (35), and these two compounds are the analogues of CPT with anticancer potentials and low toxicity [147]. Another endophytic fungus that produces CPT is a partially identified phycomycete fungus (RJMEF001) found in the bark of N. foetida in India [148]. Alternaria sp. and Fusarium oxysporum were isolated from the phloem of C. roseus and were responsible for the production of vinca alkaloids [149]. It has been reported that other compounds like aryl tetralignan podophyllotoxin is produced by the endophyte Phialocephela fortinii that was isolated from the host plant Podophyllum peltatum rhizome [150] (Figure 4).
Figure 4.

Chemotherapeutic agents obtained from endophytes.
2. Conclusion
The primary goal of research and development of NPs is to develop a therapeutic agent to treat human disease as these compounds derived from various natural resources are safer with lesser side effects and are of low cost. Natural source serves as a source of anticancer agents. In the present review, anticancer agents from a natural source have been reviewed. As reported, a large number of phytochemicals that are derived from various natural sources are under various stages of clinical developments, which shows that the natural source is still a practical way. The Earth holds a large amount of large diverse biological source, and only a few fractions of it have been explored. It continues to provide a large variety of diverse biologically active compounds that can be exploited for the development of new novel and clinically improved agents to treat human cancer with less suffering can be achieved. Most new chemicals that are being discovered are from the terrestrial origin, and some of these compounds are already in clinical use. Although marine sources show vast diversity among species and diversity among the compounds, it has been less explored due to the scarcity of technology in exploring the extreme environmental conditions, culturing the sample, and identification of the lead compound. To develop a drug with clinical application, a chemical must be identified. The development of innovative technologies has solved this problem. The advances in technologies like sample strategy and nanoscale NMR technologies to illustrate the chemical structure and biotechnology have played a vital role in the development of an ideal drug of marine origin. As a result of this, many of the chemotherapeutic agents from marine origin have entered the market for clinical use. Research on plant endophytes has revealed that it produces bioactive compounds that were originally taught to be produced by the plant in which it resides. Endophytes are known to produce superior compounds than their hosts. These endophytes may be exploited for their bioactive compounds by culturing it in the laboratory and isolating the key compounds that may be an ideal anticancer agent and lead compound of plant origin. The isolated compound may be used in improving the existing anticancer drugs or develop a structurally superior therapeutic agent with fewer side effects. It may be noted that the research on NPs is basically restricted to the academician. We need an effective collaboration between academics and pharmaceutical companies, and with the help of advanced technology, a new potential, novel anticancer drug that is safer, with less side effects and of low cost, can be produced.
Acknowledgments
The authors wish to thank the Deanship, Faculty of Pharmacy, Medical Sciences and the Deanship of Scientific Research, Al-Ahliyya Amman University, Amman, Jordan, for providing the necessary facilities. The article processing fee was partially supported by Al-Ahliyya Amman University, Amman, Jordan.
Data Availability
The data used to support the findings of this study are available within the article.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.
References
- 1.Al-Obaidi J. R., Al-Taie B. S., Allawi M. Y., Al-Obaidi K. H. Multiple-usage shrubs: medicinal and pharmaceutical usage and their environmental beneficiations. In: Aftab T., Hakeem K. R., editors. Medicinal and Aromatic Plants . Berlin, Germany: Springer; 2021a. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Khazir J., Mir B. A., Mir S. A., Cowan D. Natural products as lead compounds in drug discovery. Journal of Asian Natural Products Research . 2013;15(7):764–788. doi: 10.1080/10286020.2013.798314. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Liu Z., Zhang A., Sun H., Han Y., Kong L., Wang X. Two decades of new drug discovery and development for Alzheimer’s disease. RSC Advances . 2017;7(10):6046–2017. doi: 10.1039/c6ra26737h. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Yue Q., Gao G., Zou G., Yu H., Zheng X. Natural products as adjunctive treatment for pancreatic cancer: recent trends and advancements. BioMed Research International . 2017;2017:13. doi: 10.1155/2017/8412508.8412508 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Tundis R., Loizzo M. R., Menichini F. Natural products as α-Amylase and α-Glucosidase inhibitors and their hypoglycaemic potential in the treatment of diabetes: an update. Mini-Reviews in Medicinal Chemistry . 2010;10(4):315–331. doi: 10.2174/138955710791331007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Zhang A., Sun H., Wang X. Mass spectrometry-driven drug discovery for development of herbal medicine. Mass Spectrometry Reviews . 2018;37(3):307–320. doi: 10.1002/mas.21529. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Newman D. J., Cragg G. M. Natural products as sources of new drugs over the nearly four decades from 01/1981 to 09/2019. Journal of Natural Products . 2020;83(3):770–803. doi: 10.1021/acs.jnatprod.9b01285. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Renslo A. R., McKerrow J. H. Drug discovery and development for neglected parasitic diseases. Nature Chemical Biology . 2006;2(12):701–710. doi: 10.1038/nchembio837. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.M Pritchard E., A Dyer M., Kiplin Guy R. Progress in small molecule therapeutics for the treatment of retinoblastoma. Mini-Reviews in Medicinal Chemistry . 2016;16(6):430–454. doi: 10.2174/1389557515666150722100610. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Joanne B., Murali D., William E., Nils L. To Market To Market. Annual Reports in Medicinal Chemistry . 2011;46 [Google Scholar]
- 11.Wali A. F., Majid S., Rasool S., et al. Natural products against cancer: review on phytochemicals from marine sources in preventing cancer. Saudi Pharmaceutical Journal . 2019;27(6):767–777. doi: 10.1016/j.jsps.2019.04.013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Khazir J., Riley D. L., Pilcher L. A., De-Maayer P., Mir B. A. Anticancer agents from diverse natural sources. Natural Product Communications . 2014;9(11) doi: 10.1177/1934578x1400901130. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Lv M., Xu H. Recent advances in semisynthesis, biosynthesis, biological activities, mode of action, and structure-activity relationship of podophyllotoxins:an update (2008-2010) Mini-Reviews in Medicinal Chemistry . 2011;11(10):901–909. doi: 10.2174/138955711796575461. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Jiménez C. Marine natural products in medicinal chemistry. ACS Medicinal Chemistry Letters . 2018;9(10):959–961. doi: 10.1021/acsmedchemlett.8b00368. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Gurib-Fakim A. Medicinal plants: traditions of yesterday and drugs of tomorrow. Molecular Aspects of Medicine . 2006;27(1):1–93. doi: 10.1016/j.mam.2005.07.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Chaudhary A., Singh N. Contribution of world health organization in the global acceptance of Ayurveda. Journal of Ayurveda and Integrative Medicine . 2011;2(4):179–186. doi: 10.4103/0975-9476.90769. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Gordaliza M. Natural products as leads to anticancer drugs. Clinical and Translational Oncology . 2007;9(12):767–776. doi: 10.1007/s12094-007-0138-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Kinghorn A. D. Drug discovery from natural products. In: Lemke T. L., Williams D. A., editors. Foye’s Principles of Medicinal Chemistry . 6th. Philadelphia, PA, USA: Wolters Kluwer/Williams & Wilkins; 2008. pp. 12–25. [Google Scholar]
- 19.Sharifi-Rad J., Quispe C., Patra J. K., et al. Paclitaxel: application in modern oncology and nanomedicine-based cancer therapy. Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity . 2021;2021:24. doi: 10.1155/2021/3687700.3687700 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Guo B., Kai G., Jin H., Tang K. Review-Taxol synthesis. African Journal of Biotechnology . 2006;5:15–20. [Google Scholar]
- 21.Stierle A., Strobel G., Stierle D. Taxol and taxane production by Taxomyces andreanae, an endophytic fungus of Pacific yew. Science . 1993;260(5105):214–216. doi: 10.1126/science.8097061. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Haque A., Rahman M. A., Faizi M. S. H., Khan M. S. Next generation antineoplastic agents: a review on structurally modified vinblastine (VBL) analogues. Current Medicinal Chemistry . 2018;25(14):1650–1662. doi: 10.2174/0929867324666170502123639. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Stephens D. M., Boucher K., Kander E., et al. Hodgkin lymphoma arising in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia: outcomes from a large multi-center collaboration. Haematologica . 2021;106(11):2845–2852. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2020.256388. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Botta B., Monache G., Misiti D., Vitali A., Zappia G. Aryltetralin lignans: chemistry, pharmacology and biotransformations. Current Medicinal Chemistry . 2001;8(11):1363–1381. doi: 10.2174/0929867013372292. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Khaiwa N., Maarouf N. R., Darwish M. H., et al. Camptothecin’s journey from discovery to WHO Essential Medicine: fifty years of promise. European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry . 2021;223 doi: 10.1016/j.ejmech.2021.113639.113639 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Docetaxel. Liver tox: clinical and research information on drug-induced liver injury. Bethesda (MD): National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases . 2012 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK548899/ [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Zhu L., Chen L. Progress in research on paclitaxel and tumor immunotherapy. Cellular and Molecular Biology Letters . 2019;24(1):p. 40. doi: 10.1186/s11658-019-0164-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Tang S. C. Predictive markers of tubulin-targeting agents in breast cancer. Clinical Breast Cancer . 2008;8(2):S79–S84. doi: 10.3816/cbc.2008.s.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Zhou D. C., Zittoun R., Marie J. P. Homoharringtonine: an effective new natural product in cancer chemotherapy. Bulletin du cancer . 1995;82(12):987–995. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Aditya S., Gupta S. Ingenol mebutate: a novel topical drug for actinic keratosis. Indian Dermatol Online J . 2013;4(3):246–249. doi: 10.4103/2229-5178.115538. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Derebas J., Panuciak K., Margas M., Zawitkowska J., Lejman M. The new treatment methods for non-hodgkin lymphoma in pediatric patients. Cancers . 2022;14(6):p. 1569. doi: 10.3390/cancers14061569. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Guillen A., Finotello R., Wynne P., et al. Toxicity of cytarabine constant rate infusion in dogs with high-grade non-Hodgkin lymphoma with bone marrow or central nervous system involvement. Australian Veterinary Journal . 2020;98(3):69–78. doi: 10.1111/avj.12895. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Held-Warmkessel J. Ecteinascidin-743. Clinical Journal of Oncology Nursing . 2003;7(3):313–319. doi: 10.1188/03.Cjon.313-319. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Zijoo R., von Mehren M. Efficacy of trabectedin for the treatment of liposarcoma. Expert Opinion on Pharmacotherapy . 2016;17(14):1953–1962. doi: 10.1080/14656566.2016.1229304. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Gao G., Wang Y., Hua H., Li D., Tang C. Marine antitumor peptide dolastatin 10: biological activity, structural modification and synthetic chemistry. Marine Drugs . 2021;19(7):p. 363. doi: 10.3390/md19070363. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Dybdal-Hargreaves N. F., Risinger A. L., Mooberry S. L. Eribulin mesylate: mechanism of action of a unique microtubule-targeting agent. Clinical Cancer Research . 2015;21(11):2445–2452. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.Ccr-14-3252. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Pereira R. B., Evdokimov N. M., Lefranc F., et al. Marine-derived anticancer agents: clinical benefits, innovative mechanisms, and new targets. Marine Drugs . 2019;17(6):p. 329. doi: 10.3390/md17060329. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Huang K.-J., Chen Y.-C., El-Shazly M., et al. 5-Episinuleptolide acetate, a norcembranoidal diterpene from the formosan soft coral Sinularia sp., induces leukemia cell apoptosis through Hsp90 inhibition. Molecules . 2013;18(3):2924–2933. doi: 10.3390/molecules18032924. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Leisch M., Egle A., Greil R. Plitidepsin: a potential new treatment for relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. Future Oncology . 2019;15(2):109–120. doi: 10.2217/fon-2018-0492. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Bauer R., Mezger M., Blockhaus C., et al. 40-O -[2-Hydroxyethyl]rapamycin modulates human dendritic cell function during exposure to Aspergillus fumigatus. Journal of Basic Microbiology . 2012;52(3):269–276. doi: 10.1002/jobm.201100071. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Gao L., Gao M., Yang G., et al. Synergistic activity of carfilzomib and panobinostat in multiple myeloma cells via modulation of ROS generation and ERK1/2. BioMed Research International . 2015;2015:9. doi: 10.1155/2015/459052.459052 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Cagel M., Bernabeu E., Gonzalez L., et al. Mixed micelles for encapsulation of doxorubicin with enhanced in vitro cytotoxicity on breast and ovarian cancer cell lines versus Doxil®. Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy . 2017;95:894–903. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2017.09.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Malik S., Cusidó R. M., Mirjalili M. H., Moyano E., Palazón J., Bonfill M. Production of the anticancer drug taxol in Taxus baccata suspension cultures: a review. Process Biochemistry (Barking, UK) . 2011;46(1):23–34. doi: 10.1016/j.procbio.2010.09.004. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Hait W. N., Rubin E., Alli E., Goodin S. Tubulin targeting agents. Update on Cancer Therapeutics . 2007;2(1):1–18. [Google Scholar]
- 45.Prota A. E., Bargsten K., Zurwerra D., et al. Molecular mechanism of action of microtubule-stabilizing anticancer agents. Science . 2013;339(6119):587–590. doi: 10.1126/science.1230582. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Xiao H., Verdier-Pinard P., Fernandez-Fuentes N., et al. Insights into the mechanism of microtubule stabilization by Taxol. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America . 2006;103(27):10166–10173. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0603704103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Ganguly A., Yang H., Cabral F. Paclitaxel-dependent cell lines reveal a novel drug activity. Molecular Cancer Therapeutics . 2010;9(11):2914–2923. doi: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-10-0552. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Priyadarshini K. S., KeerthiAparajitha U. Paclitaxel against cancer: a short review. Medicinal Chemistry . 2012;2(7):1–3. doi: 10.4172/2161-0444.1000130. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Barkat M. A., Barkat M. A., Beg S., Pottoo F. H., Ahmad F. J. Nanopaclitaxel therapy: an evidence based review on the battle for next-generation formulation challenges. Nanomedicine . 2019;14(10):1323–1341. doi: 10.2217/nnm-2018-0313. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Gallego-Jara J., Lozano-Terol G., Sola-Martínez R. A., Cánovas-Díaz M., de Diego Puente T. A compressive review about Taxol (®): history and future challenges. Molecules . 2020;25(24):p. 5986. doi: 10.3390/molecules25245986. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Gerson S. L., Caimi P. F., William B. M., Creger R. J. Chapter 57—pharmacology and molecular mechanisms of antineoplastic agents for hematologic malignancies. In: Hoffman R., Benz E. J., Silberstein L. E., et al., editors. Hematology . 7th. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier; 2018. pp. 849–912. [Google Scholar]
- 52.El-Rayes B. F., Gadgeel S., Parchment R., Lorusso P., Philip P. A. A phase I study of flavopiridol and docetaxel. Investigational New Drugs . 2006;24(4):305–310. doi: 10.1007/s10637-005-4343-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Zeidner J. F., Karp J. E. Clinical activity of alvocidib (flavopiridol) in acute myeloid leukemia. Leukemia Research . 2015;39(12):1312–1318. doi: 10.1016/j.leukres.2015.10.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Chen L.-J., DeRose E. F., Burka L. T. Metabolism of furans in vitro: ipomeanine and 4-ipomeanol. Chemical Research in Toxicology . 2006;19(10):1320–1329. doi: 10.1021/tx060128f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Vann K. R., Ergün Y., Zencir S., Oncuoglu S., Osheroff N., Topcu Z. Inhibition of human DNA topoisomerase IIα by two novel ellipticine derivatives. Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry Letters . 2016;26(7):1809–1812. doi: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2016.02.034. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Kim E. J., Shin W. H. General pharmacology of CKD-732, a new anticancer agent: effects on central nervous, cardiovascular, and respiratory system. Biological and Pharmaceutical Bulletin . 2005;28(2):217–223. doi: 10.1248/bpb.28.217. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Lee H. S., Choi W. K., Son H. J., et al. Absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion of CKD-732, a novel antiangiogenic fumagillin derivative, in rats, mice, and dogs. Archives of Pharmacal Research . 2004;27(2):265–272. doi: 10.1007/bf02980116. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Shin S. J., Ahn J. B., Park K. S., et al. A Phase Ib pharmacokinetic study of the anti-angiogenic agent CKD-732 used in combination with capecitabine and oxaliplatin (XELOX) in metastatic colorectal cancer patients who progressed on irinotecan-based chemotherapy. Investigational New Drugs . 2012;30(2):672–680. doi: 10.1007/s10637-010-9625-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Shin S. J., Jeung H.-C., Ahn J. B., et al. A phase I pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic study of CKD-732, an antiangiogenic agent, in patients with refractory solid cancer. Investigational New Drugs . 2010;28(5):650–658. doi: 10.1007/s10637-009-9287-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Elinoar S. Irofulven—halloween trick or a beacon of light. Medicinal mushrooms . 2008;1(1):18–21. [Google Scholar]
- 61.Wang Y., Wiltshire T., Senft J., Wenger S. L., Reed E., Wang W. Fanconi anemia D2 protein confers chemoresistance in response to the anticancer agent, irofulven. Molecular Cancer Therapeutics . 2006;5(12):3153–3161. doi: 10.1158/1535-7163.Mct-06-0427. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Cimino P. J., Huang L., Du L., et al. Plinabulin, an inhibitor of tubulin polymerization, targets KRAS signaling through disruption of endosomal recycling. Biomedical Reports . 2019;10(4):218–224. doi: 10.3892/br.2019.1196. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Mita M. M., Spear M. A., Yee L. K., et al. Phase 1 first-in-human trial of the vascular disrupting agent Plinabulin (NPI-2358) in patients with solid tumors or lymphomas. Clinical Cancer Research . 2010;16(23):5892–5899. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.Ccr-10-1096. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Huryn D. M., Wipf P. Chapter 3—natural product chemistry and cancer drug discovery. In: Neidle S., editor. Cancer Drug Design and Discovery . 7th. Cambridge, MA, USA: Academic Press; 2014. pp. 91–120. [Google Scholar]
- 65.Saisomboon S., Kariya R., Vaeteewoottacharn K., Wongkham S., Sawanyawisuth K., Okada S. Antitumor effects of flavopiridol, a cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor, on human cholangiocarcinoma in vitro and in an in vivo xenograft model. Heliyon . 2019;5(5) doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e01675.e01675 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Wang Z., Li L., Du G.-H. Homoharringtonine (HHT) In: Du G.-H., editor. Natural Small Molecule Drugs from Plants . Singapore: Springer Singapore; 2018. pp. 521–527. [Google Scholar]
- 67.Chen X. J., Zhang W. N., Chen B., et al. Homoharringtonine deregulates MYC transcriptional expression by directly binding NF-κB repressing factor. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America . 2019;116(6):2220–2225. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1818539116. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Rehm S., Devor D. E. Acute effects of 4-ipomeanol on experimental lung tumors with bronchiolar or alveolar cell features in Syrian hamsters or C3H/HeNCr mice. Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology . 1993;120(1-2):41–50. doi: 10.1007/BF01200723. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Mi Q., Lantvit D., Reyes-Lim E., et al. Apoptotic anticancer effect of alvaradoin E isolated from Alvaradoa haitiensis. Anticancer Research . 2005;25(2A):779–787. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Phifer S. S., Lee D., Seo E.-K., et al. Alvaradoins E-N, antitumor and cytotoxic anthracenone C-glycosides from the leaves of Alvaradoa haitiensis. Journal of Natural Products . 2007;70(6):954–961. doi: 10.1021/np070005a. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Liu J., Towle M. J., Cheng H., et al. In vitro and in vivo anticancer activities of synthetic (-)-laulimalide, a marine natural product microtubule stabilizing agent. Anticancer Research . 2007;27(3b):1509–1518. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Huang C. Y., Su J. H., Duh C. Y., et al. A new 9, 11-secosterol from the soft coral Sinularia granosa. Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry Letters . 2012;22(13):4373–4376. doi: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2012.05.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Morris L. A., Christie E. M., Jaspars M., van Ofwegen L. P. A bioactive secosterol with an unusual A- and B-ring oxygenation pattern isolated from an Indonesian soft coral Lobophytum sp. Journal of Natural Products . 1998;61(4):538–541. doi: 10.1021/np9705118. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Aisa Y., Miyakawa Y., Nakazato T., et al. Fucoidan induces apoptosis of human HS-sultan cells accompanied by activation of caspase-3 and down-regulation of ERK pathways. American Journal of Hematology . 2005;78(1):7–14. doi: 10.1002/ajh.20182. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Faulkner D. J. Marine natural products. Natural Product Reports . 1986;3(1):1–33. doi: 10.1039/np9860300001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Rocha D. H. A., Seca A. M. L., Pinto D. Seaweed secondary metabolites in vitro and in vivo anticancer activity. Marine Drugs . 2018;16(11):p. 410. doi: 10.3390/md16110410. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Martínez Andrade K. A., Lauritano C., Romano G., Ianora A. Marine microalgae with anti-cancer properties. Marine Drugs . 2018;16(5):p. 165. doi: 10.3390/md16050165. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Bentle M. S., Reinicke K. E., Dong Y., Bey E. A., Boothman D. A. Nonhomologous end joining is essential for cellular resistance to the novel antitumor agent, beta-lapachone. Cancer Research . 2007;67(14):6936–6945. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.can-07-0935. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Kinghorn A. D., Chin Y. W., Swanson S. M. Discovery of natural product anticancer agents from biodiverse organisms. Current Opinion in Drug Discovery & Development . 2009;12(2):189–196. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Kong D. X., Jiang Y. Y., Zhang H. Y. Marine natural products as sources of novel scaffolds: achievement and concern. Drug Discovery Today . 2010;15(21-22):884–886. doi: 10.1016/j.drudis.2010.09.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Aricò S., Salpin C. Bioprospecting of Genetic Resources in the Deep Seabed: Scientific, Legal and Policy Aspects . Tokyo, Japan: Retrieved from United Nations University; 2005. [Google Scholar]
- 82.Blunt J. W., Carroll A. R., Copp B. R., Davis R. A., Keyzers R. A., Prinsep M. R. Marine natural products. Natural Product Reports . 2018;35(1):8–53. doi: 10.1039/c7np00052a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Hunt B., Vincent A. C. J. Scale and sustainability of marine bioprospecting for pharmaceuticals. AMBIO: A Journal of the Human Environment . 2006;35(2):57–64. doi: 10.1579/0044-7447(2006)35[57:sasomb]2.0.co;2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Montaser R., Luesch H. Marine natural products: a new wave of drugs? Future Medicinal Chemistry . 2011;3(12):1475–1489. doi: 10.4155/fmc.11.118. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Wang W. S., Chiou T. J., Liu J. H., et al. ESHAP as salvage therapy for refractory non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma: taiwan experience. Japanese Journal of Clinical Oncology . 1999;29(1):33–37. doi: 10.1093/jjco/29.1.33. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Mayer A. M., Glaser K. B., Cuevas C., et al. The odyssey of marine pharmaceuticals: a current pipeline perspective. Trends in Pharmacological Sciences . 2010;31(6):255–265. doi: 10.1016/j.tips.2010.02.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Jimeno J. M., Faircloth G. T., Sousa-Faro J. M. F., Scheuer P. J., Rinehart K. L. J. New marine derived anticancer therapeutics ─ A journey from the sea to clinical trials. Marine Drugs . 2004;2(1):14–29. doi: 10.3390/md201014. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Lindequist U. Marine-derived pharmaceuticals—challenges and opportunities. Biomolecules & Therapeutics . 2016;24(6):561–571. doi: 10.4062/biomolther.2016.181. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Shetty N., Gupta S. Eribulin drug review. South Asian Journal of Cancer . 2014;3(1):057–059. doi: 10.4103/2278-330x.126527. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Smith J. A., Wilson L., Azarenko O., et al. Eribulin binds at microtubule ends to a single site on tubulin to suppress dynamic instability. Biochemistry . 2010;49(6):1331–1337. doi: 10.1021/bi901810u. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.Ansell S. M. Brentuximab vedotin: delivering an antimitotic drug to activated lymphoma cells. Expert Opinion on Investigational Drugs . 2011;20(1):99–105. doi: 10.1517/13543784.2011.542147. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92.Doronina S. O., Mendelsohn B. A., Bovee T. D., et al. Oflazoglu E. Enhanced activity of monomethylauristatin F through monoclonal antibody delivery: effects of linker technology on efficacy and toxicity. Bioconjugate Chemistry . 2006;17(1):114–124. doi: 10.1021/bc0502917. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Luesch H., Moore R. E., Paul V. J., Mooberry S. L., Corbett T. H. Isolation of dolastatin 10 from the marine cyanobacterium Symploca species VP642 and total stereochemistry and biological evaluation of its analogue symplostatin 1. Journal of Natural Products . 2001;64(7):907–910. doi: 10.1021/np010049y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94.Sutherland M. S. K., Sanderson R. J., Gordon K. A., et al. Lysosomal trafficking and cysteine protease metabolism confer target-specific cytotoxicity by peptide-linked anti-CD30-auristatin conjugates. Journal of Biological Chemistry . 2006;281(15):10540–10547. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M510026200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95.Gomes N. G. M., Valentão P., Andrade P. B., Pereira R. B. Plitidepsin to treat multiple myeloma. Drugs Today (Barc) . 2020;56(5):337–347. doi: 10.1358/dot.2020.56.5.3135886. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96.Natsume T., Watanabe J., Ogawa K., Yasumura K., Kobayashi M. Tumor-specific antivascular effect of TZT-1027 (Soblidotin) elucidated by magnetic resonance imaging and confocal laser scanning microscopy. Cancer Science . 2007;98(4):598–604. doi: 10.1111/j.1349-7006.2007.00418.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97.Nigam M., Suleria H. A. R., Farzaei M. H., Mishra A. P. Marine anticancer drugs and their relevant targets: a treasure from the ocean. Daru Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences . 2019;27(1):491–515. doi: 10.1007/s40199-019-00273-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98.Ling Y. H., Aracil M., Zou Y., et al. PM02734 (elisidepsin) induces caspase-independent cell death associated with features of autophagy, inhibition of the Akt/mTOR signaling pathway, and activation of death-associated protein kinase. Clinical Cancer Research . 2011;17(16):5353–5366. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.Ccr-10-1948. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99.Wei W. C., Sung P. J., Duh C. Y., Chen B. W., Sheu J. H., Yang N. S. Anti-inflammatory activities of natural products isolated from soft corals of Taiwan between 2008 and 2012. Marine Drugs . 2013;11(10):4083–4126. doi: 10.3390/md11104083. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100.Gomes N. G., Dasari R., Chandra S., Kiss R., Kornienko A. Marine invertebrate metabolites with anticancer activities: solutions to the “supply problem”. Marine Drugs . 2016;14(5):p. 98. doi: 10.3390/md14050098. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101.Rajaram S., Ramulu U., Ramesh D., et al. Anti-cancer evaluation of carboxamides of furano-sesquiterpene carboxylic acids from the soft coral Sinularia kavarattiensis. Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry Letters . 2013;23(23):6234–6238. doi: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2013.09.093. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102.Su T. R., Lin J. J., Chiu C. C., et al. Proteomic investigation of anti-tumor activities exerted by sinularin against A2058 melanoma cells. Electrophoresis . 2012;33(7):1139–1152. doi: 10.1002/elps.201100462. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 103.Nair S., Kumar N., Byju K., Anuradha V., Vasundhara G. In vitro and in silico studies on the anticancer and apoptosis-inducing activities of the sterols identified from the soft coral, subergorgia reticulata. Pharmacognosy Magazine . 2014;10(37):S65–S71. doi: 10.4103/0973-1296.127345. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 104.González N., Barral M. A., Rodríguez J., Jiménez C. New cytotoxic steroids from the gorgonian Isis hippuris. Structure–activity studies. Tetrahedron . 2001;57(16):3487–3497. [Google Scholar]
- 105.Newman D. J., Cragg G. M. Natural products as sources of new drugs over the last 25 years. Journal of Natural Products . 2007;70(3):461–477. doi: 10.1021/np068054v. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 106.Nowruzi B., Haghighat S., Fahimi H., Mohammadi E. Nostoc cyanobacteria species: a new and rich source of novel bioactive compounds with pharmaceutical potential. Journal of Pharmaceutical Health Services Research . 2018;9(1):5–12. doi: 10.1111/jphs.12202. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 107.Řezanka T., Sigler K. Biologically active compounds of semi-metals. Phytochemistry . 2008;69(3):585–606. doi: 10.1016/j.phytochem.2007.09.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 108.Halford B. The bryostatins’ tale. Chemical & Engineering News Archive . 2011;89(43):10–17. doi: 10.1021/cen-v089n043.p010. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 109.Vasanthi H. R., Rajamanickam G. V., Saraswathy A. Tumoricidal effect of the red algae acanthophora spicifera on ehrlich’s ascites carcinoma in mice. Seaweed Research and Utilization . 2004;25:217–224. [Google Scholar]
- 110.Kim Y. W., Baek S. H., Lee S. H., Kim T. H., Kim S. Y. Fucoidan, a sulfated polysaccharide, inhibits osteoclast differentiation and function by modulating RANKL signaling. International Journal of Molecular Sciences . 2014;15(10):18840–18855. doi: 10.3390/ijms151018840. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 111.Mahmoud A. M., Bin-Jumah M., Abukhalil M. H. 9—antiinflammatory natural products from marine algae. In: Gopi S., Amalraj A., Kunnumakkara A., Thomas S., editors. Inflammation and Natural Products . Cambridge, MA, USA: Academic Press; 2021. pp. 175–203. [Google Scholar]
- 112.Shikov A. N., Flisyuk E. V., Obluchinskaya E. D., Pozharitskaya O. N. Pharmacokinetics of marine-derived drugs. Marine Drugs . 2020;18(11):p. 557. doi: 10.3390/md18110557. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 113.Rushdi M. I., Abdel-Rahman I. A. M., Saber H., et al. Pharmacological and natural products diversity of the brown algae genus Sargassum. RSC Advances . 2020;10(42):24951–24972. doi: 10.1039/d0ra03576a. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 114.Zhao M., Yang B., Wang J., Liu Y., Yu L., Jiang Y. Immunomodulatory and anticancer activities of flavonoids extracted from litchi (Litchi chinensis Sonn) pericarp. International Immunopharmacology . 2007;7(2):162–166. doi: 10.1016/j.intimp.2006.09.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 115.Thanigaivel S., Chandrasekaran N., Mukherjee A., John T. Seaweeds as an alternative therapeutic source for aquatic disease management. Aquaculture . 2016;464:529–536. [Google Scholar]
- 116.Murugan K., Iyer V. V. Antioxidant and antiproliferative activities of extracts of selected red and Brown seaweeds from the mandapam coast of Tamil nadu. Journal of Food Biochemistry . 2014;38(1):92–101. doi: 10.1111/jfbc.12029. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 117.Paul S., Kundu R. Antiproliferative activity of methanolic extracts from two green algae, Enteromorpha intestinalis and Rizoclonium riparium on HeLa cells. Daru Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences . 2013;21(1):p. 72. doi: 10.1186/2008-2231-21-72. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 118.Ravikumar S., Gnanadesigan M., Thajuddin N., Chakkaravarthi V. D., Banerjee B. M. Anticancer property of sponge associated actinomycetes along Palk Strait. Journal of Pharmacy Research . 2010;3(10):2415–2417. [Google Scholar]
- 119.Al-Obaidi J. R., Alobaidi K. H., Al-Taie B. S., et al. Uncovering prospective role and applications of existing and new nutraceuticals from bacterial, fungal, algal and cyanobacterial, and plant sources. Sustainability . 2021b;13(7):p. 3671. doi: 10.3390/su13073671. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 120.Okita Y., Yoshimura M., Katada Y., Saeki Y., Ohshima S. A mechanistic target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitor, everolimus safely ameliorated lupus nephritis in a patient complicated with tuberous sclerosis. Modern Rheumatology Case Reports . 2022 doi: 10.1093/mrcr/rxac033.rxac033 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 121.Jayaweera S. P. E., Wanigasinghe Kanakanamge S. P., Rajalingam D., Silva G. N. Carfilzomib: a promising proteasome inhibitor for the treatment of relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma. Frontiers in Oncology . 2021;11 doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.740796.740796 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 122.Abraham S. A., Waterhouse D. N., Mayer L. D., Cullis P. R., Madden T. D., Bally M. B. The liposomal formulation of doxorubicin. Methods in Enzymology . 2005;391:71–97. doi: 10.1016/s0076-6879(05)91004-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 123.Thorn C. F., Oshiro C., Marsh S., et al. Doxorubicin pathways: pharmacodynamics and adverse effects. Pharmacogenetics and Genomics . 2011;21(7):440–446. doi: 10.1097/FPC.0b013e32833ffb56. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 124.Preet S., Bharati S., Panjeta A., Tewari R., Rishi P. Effect of nisin and doxorubicin on DMBA-induced skin carcinogenesis--a possible adjunct therapy. Tumor Biology . 2015;36(11):8301–8308. doi: 10.1007/s13277-015-3571-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 125.Cosmegen®. Cosmegen® for injection. 2008. http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2009/050682s025lbl.pdf .
- 126.Della Latta V., Cecchettini A., Del Ry S., Morales M. A. Bleomycin in the setting of lung fibrosis induction: from biological mechanisms to counteractions. Pharmacological Research . 2015;97:122–130. doi: 10.1016/j.phrs.2015.04.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 127.Farhane Z., Bonnier F., Byrne H. J. An in vitro study of the interaction of the chemotherapeutic drug Actinomycin D with lung cancer cell lines using Raman micro-spectroscopy. Journal of Biophotonics . 2018;11(1) doi: 10.1002/jbio.201700112.e201700112 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 128.Segerman Z. J., Roy B., Hecht S. M. Characterization of bleomycin-mediated cleavage of a hairpin DNA library. Biochemistry . 2013;52(31):5315–5327. doi: 10.1021/bi400779r. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 129.Yaghoubi A., Khazaei M., Jalili S., et al. Bacteria as a double-action sword in cancer. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA)—Reviews on Cancer . 2020;1874(1) doi: 10.1016/j.bbcan.2020.188388.188388 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 130.Karpiński T. M., Adamczak A. Anticancer activity of bacterial proteins and peptides. Pharmaceutics . 2018;10(2):p. 54. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics10020054. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 131.Paiva A. D., de Oliveira M. D., de Paula S. O., Baracat-Pereira M. C., Breukink E., Mantovani H. C. Toxicity of bovicin HC5 against mammalian cell lines and the role of cholesterol in bacteriocin activity. Microbiology (Reading) . 2012;158(11):2851–2858. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.062190-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 132.Baindara P., Gautam A., Raghava G. P. S., Korpole S. Anticancer properties of a defensin like class IId bacteriocin Laterosporulin10. Scientific Reports . 2017;7(1) doi: 10.1038/srep46541.46541 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 133.Joo N. E., Ritchie K., Kamarajan P., Miao D., Kapila Y. L. Nisin, an apoptogenic bacteriocin and food preservative, attenuates HNSCC tumorigenesis via CHAC1. Cancer Medicine . 2012;1(3):295–305. doi: 10.1002/cam4.35. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 134.Al-Obaidi J. R., Jambari N. N., Ahmad-Kamil E. I. Mycopharmaceuticals and nutraceuticals: promising agents to improve human well-being and life quality. Journal of Fungi . 2021c;7(7):p. 503. doi: 10.3390/jof7070503. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 135.Misiek M., Hoffmeister D. Fungal genetics, genomics, and secondary metabolites in pharmaceutical sciences. Planta Medica . 2007;73(2):103–115. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-967104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 136.Selim K. Biology of endophytic fungi. Current Research in Environmental & Applied Mycology . 2012;2(1):31–82. doi: 10.5943/cream/2/1/3. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 137.Saleem M., Ali M. S., Hussain S., Jabbar A., Ashraf M., Lee Y. S. Marine natural products of fungal origin. Natural Product Reports . 2007;24(5):1142–1152. doi: 10.1039/B607254M. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 138.Smith G. F. Designing drugs to avoid toxicity. In: Lawton G., Witty D. R., editors. Progress in Medicinal Chemistry . Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier; 2011. pp. 1–47. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 139.Herbst R. S., Madden T. L., Tran H. T., et al. Safety and pharmacokinetic effects of TNP-470, an angiogenesis inhibitor, combined with paclitaxel in patients with solid tumors: evidence for activity in non-small-cell lung cancer. Journal of Clinical Oncology . 2002;20(22):4440–4447. doi: 10.1200/jco.2002.04.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 140.Kruger E. A., Figg W. D. TNP-470: an angiogenesis inhibitor in clinical development for cancer. Expert Opinion on Investigational Drugs . 2000;9(6):1383–1396. doi: 10.1517/13543784.9.6.1383. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 141.Li W. W., Li V. W., Hutnik M., Chiou A. S. Tumor angiogenesis as a target for dietary cancer prevention. Journal of Oncology . 2012;2012:23. doi: 10.1155/2012/879623.879623 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 142.Greve H., Mohamed I. E., Pontius A., Kehraus S., Gross H., König G. M. Fungal metabolites: structural diversity as incentive for anticancer drug development. Phytochemistry Reviews . 2010;9(4):537–545. doi: 10.1007/s11101-010-9198-5. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 143.Chandra S., Bandopadhyay R., Kumar V., Chandra R. Acclimatization of tissue cultured plantlets: from laboratory to land. Biotechnology Letters . 2010;32(9):1199–1205. doi: 10.1007/s10529-010-0290-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 144.Gunatilaka A. A. L. Natural products from plant-associated microorganisms: distribution, structural diversity, bioactivity, and implications of their occurrence. Journal of Natural Products . 2006;69(3):509–526. doi: 10.1021/np058128n. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 145.Ge J., Ping W., Zhou D. Characterization of a new species of taxol-producing fungus, Nature and Science . 2004;2(1):85–88. [Google Scholar]
- 146.Ji Y., Bi J.-N., Yan B., Zhu X.-D. Taxol-producing fungi: a new approach to industrial production of taxol. Chinese Journal of Biotechnology . 2006;22(1):1–6. doi: 10.1016/s1872-2075(06)60001-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 147.Kusari S., Zühlke S., Spiteller M. An endophytic fungus from Camptotheca acuminata that produces camptothecin and analogues. Journal of Natural Products . 2009;72(1):2–7. doi: 10.1021/np800455b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 148.Amna T., Amina M., Sharma P. R., et al. Effect of precursors feeding and media manipulation on production of novel anticancer pro-drug camptothecin from endophytic fungus. Brazilian Journal of Microbiology . 2012;43(4):1476–1489. doi: 10.1590/s1517-83822012000400032. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 149.Pandey S. S., Singh S., Babu C. S. V., et al. Fungal endophytes of Catharanthus roseus enhance vindoline content by modulating structural and regulatory genes related to terpenoid indole alkaloid biosynthesis. Scientific Reports . 2016;6(1) doi: 10.1038/srep26583.26583 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 150.Eyberger A. L., Dondapati R., Porter J. R. Endophyte fungal isolates from Podophyllum peltatum produce podophyllotoxin. Journal of Natural Products . 2006;69(8):1121–1124. doi: 10.1021/np060174f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
The data used to support the findings of this study are available within the article.
