Skip to main content
. 2022 Sep 21;25(10):105169. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2022.105169

Table 3.

Performance comparison of proposed ADH-PPI predictor with 10 existing predictors on benchmark H. pylori dataset, where results of existing PPI predictors are taken from (Yu et al., 2021) paper

Method ACC (%) Recall (%) Precision (%) MCC
SVM [6] 0.8340 0.7990 0.8570 N/A
WSR (Nanni, 2005) 0.8370 0.7900 0.8700 N/A
Ensemble of
HKNN (Nanni and Lumini, 2006)
0.8660 0.8670 0.8500 N/A
DCT+WSRC (Huang et al., 2016) 0.8674 0.8643 0.8701 0.7699
MCD+SVM (You et al., 2014) 0.8491 0.8324 0.8612 0.7440
MIMI+
NMBAC+RF (Ding et al., 2016)
0.8759 0.8681 0.8823 0.7524
DeepPPI (Du et al., 2017) 0.8623 0.8944 0.8432 0.7263
ippi-esml (Jia et al., 2015) 0.9047 ± 0.84 0.9115 ± 1.42 0.8999 ± 2.06 0.8100 ± 0.0163
WSRC (Kong et al., 2020) 0.7870 0.7321 NA 0.7693
GcForest-PPI (Yu et al., 2021) 0.8926 0.8971 0.8895 0.7857
ADH-PPI 0.9263 0.9609 0.9284 0.8547