Table 5.
Terms of reoperation and revision.
| Study | No. of hips | Overall reoperation | Reasons for reoperation |
Cup re-revision | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dislocation | Aseptic loosening | PJI | Osteolysis | Fracture | Others | ||||
| Zhang 2019 | 63 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 (1 PJI) |
| Zhou 2018 | 77 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 (1.3%) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 (1 PJI, 1 aseptic loosening) |
| Salem 2018 | 17 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Moon 2018 | 80 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 (1 aseptic loosening due to osteolysis) |
| McLaughlin 2018 | 61 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 (2 PJI, 1 aseptic loosening, 1dislocation) |
| Jo 2016 | 51 | 4 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 (4 aseptic loosening) |
| von Roth 2015 and Whaley 2001 | 89 | 18 | 4 | 10 (5 A, 5 F) | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 7 (5 aseptic loosening, 1 PJI, 1 dislocation) |
| Gustke 2014 and Gustke 2004 | 216 | 8 | 7 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 (3 aseptic loosening, 3 dislocation, 1 PJI) |
| Lachiewicz 2013 | 108 | 20 | 3 | 8 (3 A, 5 F) | 4 | 2 (F) | 3 | 0 | 7 (3 aseptic loosening, 4 PJI) |
| Wedemeyer 2008 | 17 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 (1 aseptic loosening, 1 PJI) |
| Fan 2008 | 47 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 (2 dislocation, 1 PJI) |
| Hendricks 2006 and Dearborn 2000 | 24 | 8 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 1 (F) | 0 | 1 (nonunion) | 5 (5 PJI) |
| Patel 2003 | 43 | 5 | 1 | 3 (2 A, 1 F) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 (2 aseptic loosening, 1 dislocation) |
| Obenaus 2003 | 60 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 (1 aseptic loosening, 1 PJI) |
| Total | 953 | 82/953 8.6% |
20/953 2.1% |
34/953 3.6% |
19/953 2.0% |
6/953 0.6% |
5/953 0.5% |
3/953 0.3% |
48/953 (18 PJIs, 22 aseptic loosenings, 8 dislocations) 5.0% |
PJI, periprosthetic joint infection.