Skip to main content
. 2022 Jul 25;13:100127. doi: 10.1016/j.jpi.2022.100127

Table 2.

Mean MCC and HD scores on HCT and HAC lymph node segmentation methods without and with normalization using Macenko, Vahadane, and Reinhard methods. In case of normalization methods, the mean MCC and HD scores of the test scanners are upon normalizing with best performing scanners (e.g. Scanner B and A in HCT and HAC, respectively). P-values are based on MCC scores from all scanners.

Methods Test scanner MCC HD (μm) P-value
No normalization HCT A 0.80 ± 0.21 185.43 ± 126.12 6.09E − 08
B 0.81 ± 0.26 123.52 ± 54.36
C 0.80 ± 0.25 214.94 ± 184.80
D 0.76 ± 0.29 185.48 ± 91.44
HAC A 0.87 ± 0.21 165.76 ± 98.53 5.78E − 08
B 0.82 ± 0.27 120.58 ± 49.43
C 0.85 ± 0.26 171.63 ± 96.46
D 0.81 ± 0.29 177.58 ± 82.63
Macenko HCT A 0.77 ± 0.24 189.20 ± 106.38 2.29E − 11
B 0.81 ± 0.26 123.52 ± 54.36
C 0.79 ± 0.25 175.36 ± 76.02
D 0.69 ± 0.34 206.14 ± 116.46
HAC A 0.87 ± 0.21 165.76 ± 98.53 1.27E − 09
B 0.79 ± 0.29 124.27 ± 49.31
C 0.85 ± 0.25 153.31 ± 62.57
D 0.75 ± 0.35 193.25 ± 107.46
Vahadane HCT A 0.67 ± 0.35 243.07 ± 196.36 4.25E − 09
B 0.81 ± 0.26 123.52 ± 54.36
C 0.79 ± 0.25 176.36 ± 78.40
D 0.58 ± 0.43 253.35 ± 171.29
HAC A 0.87 ± 0.21 165.76 ± 98.53 3.72E-09
B 0.77 ± 0.30 126.44 ± 47.76
C 0.85 ± 0.23 155.72 ± 64.58
D 0.62 ± 0.43 241.99 ± 158.82
Reinhard HCT A 0.74 ± 0.30 222.00 ± 192.50 1.29E − 10
B 0.81 ± 0.26 123.52 ± 54.36
C 0.64 ± 0.32 237.24 ± 129.03
D 0.71 ± 0.31 226.80 ± 166.68
HAC A 0.87 ± 0.21 165.76 ± 98.53 1.53E − 05
B 0.76 ± 0.35 159.10 ± 110.34
C 0.75 ± 0.35 197.78 ± 103.86
D 0.76 ± 0.35 212.37 ± 176.00