Skip to main content
. 2022 Jun 30;13:100113. doi: 10.1016/j.jpi.2022.100113

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

VRI evaluation workflow for secondary pathologist review. For each slide, Pathologist C first reviewed the VRIs produced from Pathologist’s A session, and provided a diagnosis. If Pathologist C felt the resolution was too low, the pathologist moved on to the union VRI, and updated their diagnosis as necessary. Finally, the pathologist had the option to review the full resolution WSI and to update their diagnosis accordingly.