Skip to main content
. 2022 Oct 18;23:334. doi: 10.1186/s12882-022-02956-8

Table 2.

Model base-case cohort characteristics

Males (N = 690) Females (N = 590)
N (% of Total Cohort) Mean Age (Years) Mean eGFR (mL/min/ 1.73 m2) N (% of Total Cohort) Mean Age (Years) Mean eGFR (mL/min/ 1.73 m2)
CKD stage G1 222 (17.3%) 33.6 105.9 225 (17.6%) 34.5 105.8
Subclass 1C 89 (7.0%) 37.7 105.0 103 (8.0%) 38.6 102.9
Subclass 1D 83 (6.5%) 33.1 102.9 80 (6.3%) 33.8 107.3
Subclass 1E 50 (3.9%) 27.0 112.4 42 (3.3%) 26.0 109.8
CKD stage G2 318 (24.8%) 39.3 74.5 280 (21.9%) 40.1 75.2
Subclass 1C 126 (9.8%) 41.8 74.7 140 (10.9%) 42.5 75.6
Subclass 1D 123 (9.6%) 39.3 74.7 106 (8.3%) 39.1 74.4
Subclass 1E 69 (5.4%) 34.8 74.0 34 (2.7%) 33.0 76.2
CKD stage G3 150 (11.7%) 41.3 50.8 85 (6.6%) 41.7 52.0
Subclass 1C 37 (2.9%) 44.9 52.1 34 (2.7%) 44.6 52.5
Subclass 1D 66 (5.2%) 41.7 51.7 34 (2.7%) 41.7 51.2
Subclass 1E 47 (3.7%) 37.9 48.5 17 (1.3%) 35.8 52.4

Source: Otsuka, data on file (2018). Analysis of baseline data for 1280 typical, rapidly progressing patients enrolled in TEMPO 3:4, regardless of randomization to treatment or placebo

See Additional file 1: Table S1 for a description of CKD stages according to the KDIGO CKD staging system [20]

CKD Chronic kidney disease, eGFR Estimated glomerular filtration rate