Skip to main content
. 2022 Jun 4;478(1-2):273–281. doi: 10.1007/s11104-022-05519-w

Table 1.

Overview of genotypes, growth as well as sampling conditions from which exudate samples were collected

Growth matrix Species Genotype Plant age at exudation sampling
Days after seeding
Sampling volume (L) Sampling period (h) Nr samples per growth matrix
High P Humic Haplic Andosol, pHH2O 5.11, fertilized N:P:K at 150:150:150 mg kg−1 Oryza sativa Nerica 4, DJ 123, Mudgo, IR 64 38 0.1 3 20
Low P Humic Haplic Andosol, pHH2O 5.11, fertilized N:P:K at 150:10:150 mg kg−1 O. sativa Mudgo, IR 64 38 0.1 3 10
Hydroponic - half-strength Hoagland Zea mays WT 3, rth3 3 22 0.5 2 11
Hydroponic - half-strength Hoagland Hordeum vulgare B13 Balashere, Bere JIC 4843 31 0.12 3 9
Hydroponic - half-strength Hoagland (-Zn) H. vulgare Bere JIC 4843 31 0.12 3 5d
Hydroponic - half-strength Hoagland (-Fe) H. vulgare Bere JIC 4843 31 0.12 3 5d
Quartz sand loam mix1 Z. mays WT 3, rth3 3 22 0.5 2 12
Loam1 Z. mays WT 3, rth3 3 22 0.5 2 28
Experimental blanks2 12
Total sum of samples 112

1substrate characteristics published in Vetterlein et al. (2021)

2MWQ water plus Micropur (10 mg L−1) from different experiments

3see also Vetterlein et al. (2021); Wen and Schnable (1994)

4samples were excluded from regression