Skip to main content
. 2022 Jun 4;478(1-2):273–281. doi: 10.1007/s11104-022-05519-w

Table 2.

Results from the linear regression models of absorbances of exudate samples (Abs Ex260 or Abs Ex254) plotted against the mg C L −1 measured with the liquid TOC analyser and calibration standards plotted against the known standard concentration (Stdknown), with absorbance of exudate samples and standards measured at 254 (Abs Std260) and 260 nm. (Abs Std260)

Abs Ex260 vs TOC Abs Std260 vs Stdknown Abs Ex254 vs TOC Abs Sdt254 vs Stdknown
Best-fit values
Slope 0.0062 0.0071 0.0077 0.0123
Y-intercept 0.0508 0.0484 0.0533 0.055
1/slope 161.4 141.1 130.1 80.95
95% Confidence Intervals
Slope 0.0059 to 0.0064 0.0070 to 0.0071 0.0072 to 0.0082 0.0122 to 0.0125
Y-intercept 0.0485 to 0.0531 0.0477 to 0.0491 0.0489 to 0.0576 0.0531 to 0.0569
Goodness of Fit
r2 0.9586 0.9999 0.9090 0.9997
Equation Y = 0.0062*X + 0.0508 Y = 0.0071*X + 0.0484 Y = 0.0077*X + 0.0533 Y = 0.0123*X + 0.055
n 102* 11 102* 11

*Fe and Zn deficient exudate samples were excluded from the regression model