. 2022 Oct 18;13:6172. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-33697-9

Table 2.

Quantities obtained either by calculations based on formulae shown in Table 1 or by fitting the datasets specified

Quantity	Input values^a/conditions	Formulae/dataset	Output value
ΔΔG_part. per FG repeat increase	C_NaCl = 0.15 mol/dm³, T = 294 K	Partition coefficient measurements (Fig. 1d, e)	−255 J/mol
ΔΔG_part. per FG repeat per 1 M increase in ionic strength	T = 294 K	Partition coefficient measurements (Fig. 1d, e)	−282 J/mol
ΔG for phase separation	N = 52, C_NaCl = 0.15 mol/dm³, T = 300 K	Formula Set 1	−17,600 J/mol
ΔG for phase separation		Formula Set 2	−16,500 J/mol
Saturation concentration		Formula Set 1	3.89 × 10⁻⁶mol/dm³
Saturation concentration		Formula Set 2	6.12 × 10⁻⁶mol/dm³
ΔΔG per 1 K increase in temperature	N = 52, C_NaCl = 0.15 mol/dm³	Formula Set 1	−494 J/mol
ΔΔG per 1 K increase in temperature	N = 52, C_NaCl = 0.15 mol/dm³	Formula Set 2	−375 J/mol
ΔΔG per 1 M increase in ionic strength	N = 52, T = 300 K	Formula Set 1	−19,300 J/mol
ΔΔG per 1 M increase in ionic strength	N = 52, T = 300 K	Centrifugation dataset (Fig. 3e)	−15,200 J/mol
ΔΔG per FG repeat increase	C_NaCl = 0.15 mol/dm³, T = 294 K	Formula Set 2	−202 J/mol
ΔΔG per FG repeat per 1 K increase in temperature	C_NaCl = 0.15 mol/dm³	Formula Set 2	−5.66 J/mol
ΔΔG per FG repeat per 1 M increase in ionic strength	T = 300 K	Centrifugation dataset (Fig. 7b)	−403 J/mol

^aInput values for calculations are selected such that outputs from orthogonal formulae/datasets (DLS, centrifugation and partition datasets) can be compared. Note the high consistency of numbers derived from orthogonal methods.