Skip to main content
. 2022 Oct 5;13:983994. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.983994

TABLE 3.

Post-hoc analysis of the within-group factor.

Outcome measure Baduanjin t-value P-value$ Brisk walking t-value P-value$
6MWT
T2-T1 25.71 (19.25) 6.55 <0.001 20.85 (20.18) 5.06 <0.001
T3-T1 21.00 (22.82) 4.51 <0.001 17.11 (20.35) 4.16 <0.001
30CST
T2-T1 1.83 (1.61) 5.59 <0.001 1.13 (0.99) 5.56 <0.001
T3-T1 1.00 (1.53) 3.20 0.004 0.83 (1.34) 3.04 0.009
TUG-DTm
T2-T1 −1.21 (0.89) –6.67 <0.001 -0.69 (0.90) –3.78 0.003
T3-T1 −1.03 (0.92) –5.48 <0.001 -0.45 (0.78) –2.82 0.015
MoCA
T2-T1 0.58 (0.97) 2.93 0.021 025 (0.85) 1.45 0.185
T3-T1 0.29 (0.75) 1.90 0.070 0.38 (0.92) 1.99 0.177
LM- immediate
T2-T1 0.92 (1.59) 2.83 0.027 0.67 (1.20) 2.71 0.036
T3-T1 0.54 (1.81) 1.44 0.163 0.50 (1.38) 1.77 0.135

$p-value was adjusted by false discovery rate method. T1, Baseline; T2, postintervention; T3, 4 weeks after the intervention; 6MWT, Six-Minute Walk Test; 30CST, 30-second chair stand test; TUG-DTm, motor dual-task Timed Up-and-Go Test; MoCA, Montreal Cognitive Assessment; LM, Logical Memory of the Wechsler Memory Scale.