Skip to main content
. 2022 Apr 8;62(9):1369–1380. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnac010

Table 2.

Baseline and Follow-Up Means and Effect Size for Primary and Secondary Outcomes

Outcome Positive STEPS group (n = 22) Control group (n = 24) Treatment effect size (partial eta squared)a P value for treatment effecta
M (SD) M (SD)
Baseline Follow-up Baseline Follow-up
Pain Interferenceb 59.4 (6.7) 55.1 (7.5) 58.9 (8.2) 59.3 (6.8) 0.166 .000
Physical Functioningb 41.5 (7.4) 43.7 (7.7) 40.8 (6.7) 40.9 (6.3) 0.075 .068
Social Participationb 50.6 (9.1) 51.9 (7.2) 48.3 (9.1) 48.1 (7.6) 0.014 .464
Pain Self-Efficacyc 4.8 (1.2) 5.1 (0.9) 4.4 (1.3) 4.2 (1.4) 0.155 .007
Resilienced 3.1 (0.6) 3.2 (0.6) 3.2 (0.5) 3.2 (0.5) 0.009 .531

aBased on univariate analysis of variance.

b T-scores are normed so that a score of 50 is the mean for the reference population and 1 SD = 10 T-score points.

cPain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire (Nicholas, 2007).

dConnor–Davidson Resilience Scale (Connor & Davidson, 2003).