Skip to main content
. 2022 Oct 18;40(Suppl 2):181–192. doi: 10.1007/s40273-022-01202-1

Table 4.

Response patterns per perspective

Response patterns Proxy 1 perspective
n (%)
Proxy 2 (substitute) perspective
n (%)
The same utility for each state 3 (1.5%) 3 (1.5%)
Fewer than 5 unique utilities 39 (19.7%) 32 (15.7%)
No negative utilities 68 (34.5%)*** 105 (51.4%)
No use of 0.5-year increments 48 (24.3%) 48 (23.5%)
States valued equal to or lower than 33333 220 (12.4%)** 171 (9.3%)
All strict dominance violations 590 (14.2%) 559 (13.3%)
Total non-trading responses (utilities of 1) 364 (16.7%) 396 (17.7%)
Total all-in trading responses (utilities of − 1) 239 (10.9%)*** 161 (7.2%)
Round responders (only utilities of − 1, − 0.5, 0, 0.5 or 1) 7 (3.6%) 7 (3.4%)
States flagged in the feedback method 165 (8.4%) 158 (7.7%)

33333 worst state defined by the EQ-5D-Y-3L instrument, n number of observations

**, ***Indicate χ2 test significance at p < 0.01 and p < 0.001, respectively