Table 1.
Techniques used to fabricate antibacterial Ti–Cu coating and their antibacterial efficacy.
Substrate | Antibacterial Agents | Fabricating Method | Description | Antibacterial Rate (%) | Ref. |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pure Titanium | Copper | Ion Implantation | The concentration of Cu was 4 × 1017 Cu ions/cm2 | 100% in plate count method test | [135] |
Si wafer | Ti-xCu film | High power impulse magnetron sputtering (HiPIMS) and DC magnetron sputtering (DCMS) | A cuboid Ti target was used for DC magnetron sputtering (DCMS), and a Cu target was sputtered using high power pulsed magnetron sputtering (HPPMS) | The antibacterial activity of Ti-xCuO coatings, x = 3.1–33.9 at.% in plate count method was 99% | [116] |
Pure Ti | Nitrogen (N) and copper (Cu) dual ions | plasma immersion ion implantation and deposition (PIII&D) | Titanium nitride (TiN) film was embedded with Cu nanoparticles (Cu NPs) | Cu–Ti and N/Cu–Ti samples showed nearly 100% antibacterial efficacy in bacterial counting method | [126] |
316L stainless steel and Si | Ti-xCu coating | Hybrid high power impulse magnetron sputtering (HiPIMS) and DC magnetron co-sputtering (DCMS) | Ti-xCu coatings were co-sputtered on silicon wafers and polished 316 L stainless steel substrates using DCMS and HiPIMS techniques | Pure Cu and Ti-xCu coatings with x = 55 and 65 at.% showed an antibacterial efficacy of 99.9% | [105] |