Skip to main content
. 2022 Aug 24;55(5):388–396. doi: 10.5090/jcs.22.016

Table 7.

Trends in bioprosthetic valves in the aortic position

Variable Total (n=2,697) Year p-valuea)

2017 (n=649) 2018 (n=743) 2019 (n=614) 2020 (n=691)
Total (n=2,697) 0.017
Conventional bioprostheses 2,170 (80.5) 551 (84.9) 599 (80.6) 460 (74.9) 560 (81.0)
Sutureless or rapid-deployment valve 527 (19.5) 98 (15.1) 144 (19.4) 154 (25.1) 131 (19.0)
Combined procedure (n=1,351) 0.160
Conventional bioprostheses 1,136 (84.1) 298 (86.9) 297 (84.9) 247 (79.9) 294 (84.2)
Sutureless or rapid-deployment valve 215 (15.9) 45 (13.1) 53 (15.1) 62 (20.1) 55 (15.8)
Age >70 yr (n=1,594) 0.807
Conventional bioprostheses 1,229 (77.1) 280 (79.5) 295 (74.9) 284 (73.8) 370 (79.9)
Sutureless or rapid-deployment valve 365 (22.9) 72 (20.5) 99 (25.1) 101 (26.2) 93 (20.1)
Age >80 yr (n=333) 0.302
Conventional bioprostheses 223 (67.0) 55 (76.4) 51 (63.0) 51 (62.2) 66 (67.3)
Sutureless or rapid-deployment valve 110 (33.0) 17 (23.6) 30 (37.0) 31 (37.8|) 32 (32.7)

Values are presented as number (%).

a)By the Cochran-Armitage test for trend.