Skip to main content
. 2022 Oct 18;328(15):1506–1514. doi: 10.1001/jama.2022.18231

Table 2. Effect of Spinal Cord Burst Stimulation on Primary and Secondary Outcomes.

Mean score (95% CI) P value
At baseline Spinal cord burst stimulation Placebo stimulation Between-group difference
No. of stimulation periods 91 89
Primary outcome
Oswestry Disability Index, pointsa 44.7 (41.4 to 47.9) 34.0 (30.0 to 38.1) 35.4 (31.3 to 39.4)
Change from baseline −10.6 (−14.1 to −7.2) −9.3 (−12.7 to −5.9) −1.3 (−3.9 to 1.3) .32
Secondary outcomes
Numerical Rating Scaleb
Leg pain 7.3 (6.8 to 7.7) 5.9 (5.3 to 6.4) 6.1 (5.6 to 6.6) −0.2 (−0.7 to 0.2) .32
Back pain 6.8 (6.4 to 7.3) 5.7 (5.2 to 6.2) 6.1 (5.6 to 6.6) −0.4 (−0.8 to 0.04) .07
5-Dimension EuroQol indexc 0.21 (0.13 to 0.28) 0.48 (0.39 to 0.56) 0.44 (0.35 to 0.53) 0.04 (−0.03 to 0.11) .32
Physical activity leveld
No. of steps per day 6775 (5651 to 7899) 7561 (6411 to 8710) 7155 (6006 to 8305) 405 (−422 to 1233) .34
Time spent standing or walking, h/d 3.8 (3.3 to 4.3) 4.0 (3.5 to 4.4) 4.0 (3.6 to 4.4) −0.02 (−0.4 to 0.3) .89
a

Scores range from 0 points (no disability) to 100 points (maximum disability). The minimal clinically important difference (MCID) was 10 points. A typical patient with moderate back pain and disability would have a score between 20 and 40. Scores greater than 40 indicate severe disability.

b

Scores range from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain imaginable). The MCID was 1.0 points.

c

A score of 0 indicates death and a score of 1 indicates a perfect health state. The MCID was 0.03. Scores between 0.2 and 0.5 represented a severe to moderate reduction in overall health-related quality of life.

d

Measured using a body-worn accelerometer (ActivPAL, PAL Technologies, Ltd).