TABLE 7.
Performance comparison of different values of m for our method, using dataset 1.
| m | A01 | A02 | A03 | A04 | A05 | A06 | A07 | A08 | A09 |
| 1 | 84.48 | 80.69 | 88.28 | 83.75 | 82.41 | 77.24 | 82.41 | 86.56 | 89.66 |
| 2 | 88.97 | 81.38 | 92.41 | 84.58 | 84.83 | 80.69 | 85.52 | 86.90 | 93.10 |
| 3 | 89.31 | 83.79 | 94.83 | 84.58 | 84.83 | 82.76 | 85.52 | 90.69 | 93.79 |
| 4 | 91.38 | 84.83 | 94.83 | 85.00 | 85.52 | 83.10 | 85.17 | 93.10 | 94.14 |
| 5 | 93.45 | 81.38 | 95.52 | 88.33 | 84.14 | 81.38 | 87.24 | 94.83 | 93.79 |
| 6 | 92.41 | 83.45 | 95.52 | 86.25 | 86.55 | 82.41 | 88.62 | 95.17 | 93.45 |
| 7 | 93.45 | 82.41 | 93.79 | 87.50 | 83.79 | 82.41 | 88.97 | 95.52 | 94.48 |
| STD | 3.21 | 1.51 | 2.59 | 1.70 | 1.32 | 2.02 | 2.27 | 3.85 | 1.62 |