Skip to main content
. 2022 Oct 5;16:952474. doi: 10.3389/fninf.2022.952474

TABLE 7.

Performance comparison of different values of m for our method, using dataset 1.

m A01 A02 A03 A04 A05 A06 A07 A08 A09
1 84.48 80.69 88.28 83.75 82.41 77.24 82.41 86.56 89.66
2 88.97 81.38 92.41 84.58 84.83 80.69 85.52 86.90 93.10
3 89.31 83.79 94.83 84.58 84.83 82.76 85.52 90.69 93.79
4 91.38 84.83 94.83 85.00 85.52 83.10 85.17 93.10 94.14
5 93.45 81.38 95.52 88.33 84.14 81.38 87.24 94.83 93.79
6 92.41 83.45 95.52 86.25 86.55 82.41 88.62 95.17 93.45
7 93.45 82.41 93.79 87.50 83.79 82.41 88.97 95.52 94.48
STD 3.21 1.51 2.59 1.70 1.32 2.02 2.27 3.85 1.62