Skip to main content
. 2022 Oct 5;13:877627. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.877627

Table 2.

Summary of statistical differences by type of pseudowords in Experiment 1 and Experiment 2.

Error RT
β SE z β SE t
Experiment 1
Intercept −2.65 0.16 −16.91 6.87 0.02 321.68
F pseudowords—ID 0.54 0.18 3.03* 0.06 0.01 6.55*
L pseudowords—F pseudowords 0.51 0.15 3.47* 0.09 0.01 9.25*
Experiment 2
Intercept −1.81 0.14 −12.89 7.02 0.02 306.85
F pseudowords—ID 0.79 0.15 5.14* −0.00 0.01 −0.27
I pseudowords—F pseudowords 0.44 0.13 3.50* 0.10 0.01 10.57*
L pseudowords—I pseudowords 0.37 0.11 3.21* 0.03 0.01 3.02*
*

Statistically significant effects at t/z > 1.96, p < 0.05.

F pseudowords, first-two-character transposed pseudowords; I pseudowords, inner-two-character transposed pseudowords; L pseudowords, last-two-character transposed pseudowords; and RT, response time.