Table 2.
Summary of statistical differences by type of pseudowords in Experiment 1 and Experiment 2.
| Error | RT | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| β | SE | z | β | SE | t | |
| Experiment 1 | ||||||
| Intercept | −2.65 | 0.16 | −16.91 | 6.87 | 0.02 | 321.68 |
| F pseudowords—ID | 0.54 | 0.18 | 3.03* | 0.06 | 0.01 | 6.55* |
| L pseudowords—F pseudowords | 0.51 | 0.15 | 3.47* | 0.09 | 0.01 | 9.25* |
| Experiment 2 | ||||||
| Intercept | −1.81 | 0.14 | −12.89 | 7.02 | 0.02 | 306.85 |
| F pseudowords—ID | 0.79 | 0.15 | 5.14* | −0.00 | 0.01 | −0.27 |
| I pseudowords—F pseudowords | 0.44 | 0.13 | 3.50* | 0.10 | 0.01 | 10.57* |
| L pseudowords—I pseudowords | 0.37 | 0.11 | 3.21* | 0.03 | 0.01 | 3.02* |
Statistically significant effects at t/z > 1.96, p < 0.05.
F pseudowords, first-two-character transposed pseudowords; I pseudowords, inner-two-character transposed pseudowords; L pseudowords, last-two-character transposed pseudowords; and RT, response time.