Skip to main content
. 2015 Jul 29;2015(7):CD007373. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007373.pub3

Brody 2011.

Methods Location: Chattanooga, TN, USA
Recruitment time: August 2010 to September 2012
Sample size calculation and outcome of focus: no mention
Participants General with N: 210 women
Source: University department of obstetrics and gynecology
Inclusion criteria: receiving Mirena for standard indications, did not receive NSAID
Exclusion criteria: do not desire to be in study, have taken narcotics, Mirena not able to be placed, cervical dilation required, allergy to lidocaine
Interventions 1) 5 cc 2% lidocaine gel on cervix and intracervically
2) Lubricant: KY gel
Timing: no mention
Outcomes Primary: VAS (0 to 10) pain scores in 3 categories of 0 to 2, 3 to 4, and ≥ 5; assessed at time of insertion and at 5 and 10 min after insertion
Secondary: no mention
Notes IUC used: LNG‐IUS (Mirena)
Estimated completion September 2012
Could not find any publication; unable to obtain information from investigator (15 October 2014)