TABLE 1.

Bayesian independence test of the times to fates extracted from B and CD8⁺ T cell filming datasets. For each pair of the times to fates, the correlation coefficient was estimated with 95% credible interval using bivariate normal distribution and Bayes Factor (BF) was calculated. Given two hypotheses (H₀: ρ = 0 and H₁: ρ ≠ 0), if the data is more probable under H₀, then it is BF₀₁ times more favoured than H₁, otherwise H₁ is BF₁₀ times more favoured than H₀.

Cell type	Stim	Number of clones (N) and bayes Factor a (BF01 = 1/BF10) and correlation coefficient [ρ (CI)]
		( ${\mathit{T}}_{div}^0,T_{div}^{k\ge 1}$ )	( ${\mathit{T}}_{div}^0,T_{ld}$ )	( ${\mathit{T}}_{div}^0,T_{die}$ )	( ${\mathit{T}}_{div}^{k\ge 1},T_{ld}$ )	( ${\mathit{T}}_{div}^{k\ge 1},T_{die}$ )	(T ld , T die )
B (B-exp1)	CpG	N = 56	N = 69	N = 69	N = 56	N = 56	N = 69
		BF01 = 1.05	BF01 = 3.92	BF01 = 5.12	BF01 = 6.00	BF01 = 2.82	BF10 > 100
		0.24 [0.01, 0.48]	0.12 [−0.10, 0.35]	0.09 [−0.14, 0.31]	0.0 [−0.25, 0.25]	0.16 [−0.08, 0.40]	0.57 [0.42, 0.72]
CD8+ T	1U IL-2	N = 4	N = 28	N = 28	N = 4	N = 4	N = 28
		BF01 = 1.70	BF10 = 39.09	BF01 = 2.53	BF01 = 1.53	BF01 = 1.43	BF10 > 100
		−0.01 [−0.86, 0.85]	0.55 [0.29, 0.78]	0.19 [−0.15, 0.53]	−0.15 [−0.96, 0.71]	0.20 [−0.66, 0.98]	0.59 [0.35, 0.81]
	3U IL-2	N = 13	N = 34	N = 34	N = 13	N = 13	N = 34
		BF10 = 17.17	BF10 = 50.05	BF10 = 1.46	BF10 = 28.96	BF10 = 3.13	BF10 > 100
		0.67 [0.36, 0.93]	0.52 [0.28, 0.75]	0.32 [0.03, 0.61]	0.70 [0.41, 0.94]	0.52 [0.12, 0.87]	0.64 [0.44, 0.82]
	10U IL-2	N = 16	N = 50	N = 50	N = 16	N = 16	N = 50
		BF10 = 7.55	BF10 > 100	BF10 = 15.39	BF10 > 100	BF10 = 1.56	BF10 > 100
		0.57 [0.23, 0.86]	0.58 [0.41, 0.75]	0.40 [0.18, 0.62]	0.76 [0.55, 0.94]	0.42 [0.02, 0.79]	0.63 [0.46, 0.78]

^a BF Interpretation: Anecdotal (1 < BF ≤ 3); Moderate (3 < BF ≤ 10); Strong (10 < BF ≤ 30); Very strong (30 < BF ≤ 100); Extreme (BF > 100).