Skip to main content
. 2000 Jan;7(1):31–39. doi: 10.1128/cdli.7.1.31-39.2000

TABLE 2.

Immunoglobulin concentrations in 14 samples of nasal wash (obtained by method 3) from eight adults and 1 sample from a child as determined by isotype-specific ELISAa

Subject and sampleb Total IgA (μg ml−1) S-IgA (%) IgA1c (%) IgG (μg ml−1) IgM (μg ml−1)
A3,1 16.2  88  92  6.1  0.6 
B3,1 10.7  86  91  7.1  0.4 
B3,2 16.0 (458)d NDe 91  1.3 (37.2) 0.4 (11.4)
C3,1 31.5  93  80  6.1  1.5
D3,1 73.4  87  75  35.4  1.9 
E3,1 9.6  97  91  0.2  0.2 
E3,2 60.2 (1,336) ND 95  2.0 (44.4) 1.1 (24.4)
E3,3 24.9 (553) ND 88  2.8 (62.2) 0.4 (8.9)
F3,1 44.8 (896) ND 84  1.4 (28.0) 0.3 (6.0)
F3,2 10.4 (231) ND 91  1.2 (26.6) 0.1 (2.2)
G3,1 34.8 (870) ND 94  3.9 (97.5) 0.4 (10.0)
G3,2 12.0 (343) ND 93 0.4 (11.4) 0.1 (2.9)
G3,3 39.5  ND 91  1.0  0.3 
H3,1 116.3 (2,326) ND 93  5.5 (110) 2.9 (58.4)
Iw,3f 6.5  ND 89  0.2  0.05 
Median (range) (711   [231–2,326]) 88 [86–97] 91 [75–95] (40.8 [11.4–110]) (9.5 [2.2–58.4])
a

IgA data include subclass distribution and, for five samples, estimates of S-IgA relative to total IgA. Calculated immunoglobulin levels in undiluted secretions are included for eight samples obtained with washing medium containing 2 mM lithium as an internal standard. 

b

The first number indicates the method, and the second number indicates the sample. 

c

Calculated as [IgA1] × ([IgA1] + [IgA2])−1 × 100%. 

d

Numbers in parentheses indicate the concentration in the undiluted secretion (calculated for lithium-containing samples only). 

e

ND, not determined. 

f

Third sample of wash from the child (subject I).