Skip to main content
. 2022 Oct 19;7:60. doi: 10.1038/s41536-022-00256-1

Fig. 10. Varying the structural properties of the 3D printed composite does not affect tibial length, angle, or bone metrics.

Fig. 10

a Tibial length change for the control limbs (dashed) and treatment limbs (solid bars) at 5-, 8-, and 12-weeks post treatment using Formulation A, B, or C. A significant difference was observed between Formulation A and C at 12-weeks post treatment in the treatment limb. *Denotes significant difference in tibial length change of treatment limbs (*p < 0.05; two-way ANOVA, Tukey’s HSD post hoc). b Tibial angle of control limbs (dashed) was similar, as were the tibial angles of the treatment limbs (solid bars) across groups at both 5-, 8-, and 12-weeks post treatment. c No bone metrics measured by microCT were different across scaffold formulations. Data represent mean ± standard deviation (error bars).