TABLE 3.
Summary of methods using external controls for improvement of statistical power.
| Method | External control data | Require internal control? | Require sequencing depth for cases and controls? | Method correcting for batch differences between case controls | Can the method adjust for covariates? | Test |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RVS (Derkach et al., 2014) | Individual genotype likelihood | N | N | Modeling the effect of sequencing depth | N | Single variant based test, burden test and variance component based test |
| TASER (Hu et al., 2016) | Individual Bam files | N | N | Modeling the effect of sequencing depth | N | Burden test |
| Chen and Lin (Chen and Lin, 2020) | Individual genotype likelihood | N | N | Modeling the effect of sequencing depth | Y | Single common variant based test |
| iECAT-Score (Li and Lee, 2021) | Individual genotypes | Y | N | Only use the external control if no batch effect exists | Y | Single variant based test for common and rare |
| iECAT-O (Lee et al., 2017) | Summary counts | Y | N | Only use the external control if no batch effect exists | N | A combination of burden test and variance component based test |
| ProxECAT (Hendricks et al., 2018) | Summary counts | N | N | Use non-functional variants as a baseline in the test | N | Burden test based on rare allele counts |
| TRAPD (Guo et al., 2018) | Summary counts | N | ≥ 10 in 90% of samples | Adjusting filtering criteria | N | Burden test based on sample counts |
| RV- EXCALIBER (Lali et al., 2021) | Summary counts | Preferred | ≥ 20 in 90% of samples | Adjust the expected counts sample-wise and gene-wise | N | Burden test based on rare allele counts |
| CoCoRV (Chen et al., 2022) | Summary counts | N | ≥10 in 90% of samples | Consistent filtering to keep high quality variants | N | Burden test based on sample counts |