TABLE 3.
Meta-analysis of the association between genetic polymorphism and symptomatic lumbar disk herniation.
Genetic model | Overall effect | Heterogeneity | Publication bias | Analysis model | FPRP | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IL-1α(+889C/T) | OR (95%CL) | P | I2 | P | Begg’s | Egger’s | 0.1 | 0.01 | 0.001 | |
T vs. C | 1.28 (1.03–1.6) | 0.028 | 0 | 0.742 | 0.23 | 0.62 | Fix | 0.228 | 0.765 | 0.970 |
CT/TT vs. CC | 1.23 (0.92–1.64) | 0.167 | 0 | 0.876 | 0.133 | 0.189 | Fix | |||
TT vs. CC/CT | 1.92 (1.16–3.17) | 0.01 | 0 | 0.801 | 0.764 | 0.894 | Fix | 0.367 | 0.864 | 0.985 |
TT vs. CC | 2.00 (1.19–3.38) | 0.009 | 0 | 0.780 | 0.368 | 0.861 | Fix | 0.380 | 0.871 | 0.986 |
CT vs. CC | 1.10 (0.81–1.49) | 0.535 | 0 | 0.929 | 0.133 | 0.136 | Fix | |||
CILP (1184T>C) | ||||||||||
C vs. T | 1.01 (0.62–1.66) | 0.959 | 91.5% | 0.00 | 0.881 | 0.825 | Random | |||
CT/CC vs. TT | 1.02 (0.60–1.73) | 0.949 | 86.4% | 0.001 | 0.764 | 0.887 | Random | |||
CC vs. TT/CT | 1.00 (0.36–2.76) | 0.997 | 89.4% | 0.000 | 0.881 | 0.729 | Random | |||
CC vs. TT | 0.98 (0.31–3.14) | 0.972 | 90.9% | 0.000 | 0.652 | 0.763 | Random | |||
CT vs. TT | 1.05 (0.69–1.60) | 0.825 | 76.3% | 0.015 | 0.707 | 0.811 | Random |