Skip to main content
. 2022 Oct 19;23:437. doi: 10.1186/s12859-022-04984-5

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

Analysis of immune characteristics of high-risk and low-risk samples. A Comparison of stromal score, immune score and estimate score between high-risk and low-risk groups in the TME of LC samples with CIBERSORT. B Comparison of stromal score, immune score and microenvironment score between high-risk and low-risk groups in the TME of LC samples with XCELL. C Scores of infiltration cells in high-risk and low-risk groups of LC samples with ssGSEA. D Scores of infiltration functions in high-risk and low-risk groups of LC samples with ssGSEA. E Correlation with various immune cells and risk model. F The infiltration of immune cells involved in high-risk and low-risk groups in LC samples with XCELL. G The infiltration of 22 types of immune cells involved in high-risk and low-risk groups in LC samples with CIBERSORT. H The infiltration of 22 types of immune cells involved in high-risk and low-risk groups in LC samples with CIBERSORT-ABS. I The infiltration of immune cells involved in high-risk and low-risk groups in LC with Timer. J The infiltration of immune cells involved in high-risk and low-risk groups in LC with QUANTISEQ. K The infiltration of immune cells involved in high-risk and low-risk groups in LC samples with MCPCOUNTER