Skip to main content
. 2022 Oct 17;31:e74. doi: 10.1017/S2045796022000592

Table 3.

Results of ordinal logistic regression analysis comparing anxiety and depression prevalence between different cancer types

Cancer type Anxiety Depression
estimate s.e. OR Lower limit Upper limit estimate s.e. OR Lower limit Upper limit
Haematological −0.472 0.134 0.624 0.480 0.810 −0.372 0.138 0.689 0.526 0.903
Breast −0.162 0.138 0.851 0.649 1.115 −0.440 0.146 0.644 0.484 0.858
Lung 0.188 0.135 1.207 0.927 1.572 0.375 0.138 1.454 1.110 1.905
Soft tissue −0.107 0.152 0.898 0.667 1.210 −0.130 0.160 0.878 0.642 1.200
Pancreas 0.105 0.151 1.111 0.827 1.493 0.165 0.154 1.179 0.871 1.596
Colon/rectum −0.331 0.157 0.718 0.528 0.978 −0.211 0.162 0.810 0.590 1.112
Head and neck 0.090 0.156 1.095 0.807 1.485 0.196 0.159 1.216 0.891 1.661
Brain 0.136 0.157 1.145 0.842 1.558 0.239 0.163 1.270 0.923 1.746
Stomach/oesophagusa 0 1 0 1
Kidney/urinary tract/bladder 0.134 0.171 1.143 0.818 1.596 0.282 0.172 1.326 0.947 1.857
Female genital organs −0.133 0.179 0.875 0.616 1.243 −0.088 0.191 0.915 0.630 1.331
Prostate 0.089 0.215 1.094 0.718 1.666 −0.006 0.215 0.994 0.652 1.516
Testis −0.763 0.257 0.466 0.282 0.771 −0.419 0.274 0.658 0.385 1.125

Note. s.e., standard error; OR: odds ratio. Model controlled for gender and age.

a

Stomach/oesophagus cancer was used as reference category with estimate set to 0 and odds ratio set to 1. No standard error or limits can be computed for the reference category.