Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Oct 20.
Published in final edited form as: J Physiol. 2021 Apr 18;599(10):2723–2750. doi: 10.1113/JP281033

Table 5:

Characteristic frequency adaptation [initial {(f2-f1)/f1} and average of all {(fi-1-fi)/f1}] at different current injection strengths from conditioning hyperpolarized potentials for randomly sampled (Random) and Y1eGFP SDH neurons. Number in brackets indicates number of animals. LCI, MCI and HCI denote Low, Medium and High strengths of current Injection. DSLF stand for delayed short latency firing (N is non-adapting, A is adapting), DLLF for delayed long latency firing, IBF for initial burst firing and TF for tonic firing. 1–5 neurons averaged for each mouse. Values represent mean ± SD.

Random Y1eGFP
LCIA MCIB HCIC LCID MCIE HCIF
Initial frequency adaptation DSLF-N −0.13±0.13 (9) −0.01±0.19 (8) −0.04±0.18 (9) DSLF-A −0.21±0.14 (18) −0.14±0.11 (17) *(BE) −0.10±0.09 (18)
DLLF −0.14±0.61 (5) 0.07±0.23 (5) −0.09±0.09 (5) DLLF −0.15±0.16 (12) 0.11±0.20 (12) 0.09±0.16 (12) *(CF)
IBF 0.08±0.35 (4) −0.16±0.27 (4) −0.18±0.30 (4) IBF −0.47±0.09 (7) **(AD) −0.32±0.10 (7) −0.25±0.35 (7)
TF −0.09±0.01 (2) 0.01±0.01 (2) −0.04±0.02 (2) TF 0.33±0.12 (2) *(AD) 0.04±0.13 (2) −0.01±0.05 (2)
average frequency adaptation DSLF-N −0.05±0.13 (9) −0.00±0.05 (8) −0.03±0.04 (9) DSLF-A −0.11±0.03 (15) −0.07±0.05 (15) **(BE) −0.08±0.04 (17) **(CF)
DLLF −0.04±0.13 (5) −0.04±0.04 (5) −0.05±0.03 (5) DLLF −0.09±0.08 (12) −0.03±0.03 (12) −0.04±0.06 (12)
IBF −0.01±0.11 (4) 0.00±0.05 (4) −0.02±0.03 (4) IBF −0.2±0.16(7) *(AD) −0.19±0.13 (7) *(BE) −0.12±0.08 (7) *(CF)
TF −0.42±0.43 (2) −0.00±0.00 (2) −0.00±0.00 (2) TF −0.15±0.17 (2) −0.00±0.00 (2) −0.01±0.01 (2)
*

p<0.05,

**

p<0.01 or

***

p<0.001: Student’s t-test, for respective injecting strengths, randomly sampled vs. Y1eGFP.