Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Oct 20.
Published in final edited form as: J Orthop Res. 2016 Apr 7;34(11):2001–2008. doi: 10.1002/jor.23210

Table 1.

Experimental Protocol and Data Obtained Using the Robotic/UFS Testing System Under a 67-N Anterior Tibial Load Without (I–III.A) and With (I–III.B) 100 N Axial Compression

Protocol Data Obtained
I. Intact joint
 Path of passive flexion-extension
 External loading conditions
  A. 67-N anterior tibial load Intact kinematics (I.A)
  B. 67-N anterior tibial load + 100 N axial compression Transect ACL Intact kinematics (I.B)
II. ACL-deficient joint
 Repeat kinematics I.A, I.B In-situ forces in the ACL
 Apply loads I.A, I.B ACL-deficient kinematics (II.A, II.B)
III. Mg ring repair of the ACL
 Perform Mg ring repair
 Apply loads I.A, I.B Mg ring repair kinematics (III.A, III.B)
 Release Mg ring
 Repeat kinematics III.A, III.B In-situ forces in Mg ring-repaired ACL
IV. Medial meniscus-deficient joint
 Repeat kinematics I, II, III In-situ forces in the medial meniscus