Table 3.
Diagnostic efficiency of different methods.
| TP | TN | FP | FN | Sensitivity | Specificity | PPV | NPV | Accurate | AUC | 95%CI | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PET/CT | 111 | 30 | 30 | 0 | 100 | 50 | 78.72 | 100 | 82.46 | 0.75 | 0.87-0.97 |
| FDG Heterogenity | 104 | 54 | 6 | 7 | 93.69 | 90 | 94.55 | 88.52 | 92.40 | 0.92 | 0.66-0.84 |
| Combining two methods | 111 | 57 | 3 | 0 | 100 | 95 | 97.37 | 100 | 98.25 | 0.97 | 0.93-1.00 |
| SUVmax proximal/distal | 107 | 52 | 8 | 4 | 96.40 | 86.67 | 93.04 | 92.86 | 92.98 | 0.93 | 0.89-0.98 |