Table 4.
The relationship between reflectivity and subscales of metacognitive strategies and resource management test
| Scale | Reflectivity group | Number | Mean | Standard deviation | Standard error | Observed T | Freedom degree | Significance level |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Planning | Weak | 5 | 3.90 | 0.82 | 0.36 | 0.19 | 32 | 0.84 |
| Good | 29 | 3.82 | 0.77 | 0.14 | ||||
| Supervision and control | Weak | 5 | 3.70 | 0.90 | 0.40 | 0.29 | 32 | 0.76 |
| Good | 29 | 3.62 | 0.48 | 0.08 | ||||
| Effort and perseverance | Weak | 5 | 3.40 | 1.29 | 0.57 | 0.55 | 32 | 0.58 |
| Good | 29 | 3.13 | 0.91 | 0.16 | ||||
|
Regulatory activity |
Weak | 5 | 2.20 | 1.30 | 0.58 | 0.81 | 32 | 0.42 |
| Good | 29 | 2.68 | 1.22 | 0.22 |
*Level of significance = 0.05